1983
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3991(83)90053-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical computation of amplitudes and phases in electron diffraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
54
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(i) The oscillation periodicities of both the amplitudes and the phases for different beams in our result are systematically a little smaller than those reported by Self et al (1983). We suspect that this may be due to different ways of calculating the scattering factor.…”
Section: Consistency In Theemcontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(i) The oscillation periodicities of both the amplitudes and the phases for different beams in our result are systematically a little smaller than those reported by Self et al (1983). We suspect that this may be due to different ways of calculating the scattering factor.…”
Section: Consistency In Theemcontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…(ii) The sign of the phase in our plots is opposite to that of Self et al (1983); this is possibly due to a different choice of zero reference point -we have taken the (000) beam as the reference point.…”
Section: Consistency In Theemmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For these computations 2267 diffracted beams were propagated through the crystal. In order to do this, interactions were considered with 9089 phase-grating coefficients out to 25.85nm-l. For accurate representation of the phase-grating by the 128 x 128 array, 16 Results and Discussion For specimen thickness greater than 20nm at Scherzer defocus, the computer HREM images contain additional non-structural detail ( fig. 7, 100% perfect).…”
Section: Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multislice simulation algorithm (Cowley & Moodie, 1957) is one of the most valuable simulations for CTEM. New applications, modifications, and analysis of the algorithm appear regularly (Goodman & Moodie, 1974;lshizuka & Uyeda, 1977;O'Keefe & Buseck, 1979;Self, O'Keefe, Buseck & Spargo, 1983;Van Dyck, 1985). A recent modification of the algorithm has extended its applicability to include the simulation of ADF STEM images (Kirkland, Loane & Silcox 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%