2003
DOI: 10.1002/cem.790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical aspects of PARAFAC modeling of fluorescence excitation‐emission data

Abstract: This paper presents a dedicated investigation and practical description of how to apply PARAFAC modeling to complicated fluorescence excitation±emission measurements. The steps involved in finding the optimal PARAFAC model are described in detail based on the characteristics of fluorescence data. These steps include choosing the right number of components, handling problems with missing values and scatter, detecting variables influenced by noise and identifying outliers. Various validation methods are applied … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
322
0
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 549 publications
(331 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
322
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, such samples need to be identified and excluded from the modeling step. Some suggestions of how to find outlying samples in three-way data which work very well in very specific situations, but are not sufficient for general cases, can be found in the literature [12,13]. Recently, Engelen and Hubert [1] have proposed a robust PARAFAC method dedicated to provide a model that fits the majority of the data and is not hampered by outlying samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, such samples need to be identified and excluded from the modeling step. Some suggestions of how to find outlying samples in three-way data which work very well in very specific situations, but are not sufficient for general cases, can be found in the literature [12,13]. Recently, Engelen and Hubert [1] have proposed a robust PARAFAC method dedicated to provide a model that fits the majority of the data and is not hampered by outlying samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefit of using methods like parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) [81,88,89] or Multivariate Curve Resolution (MCR) [90][91][92][93] for the analysis of MDF data is that, under favourable conditions (i.e. minimal IFE and FRET), they can extract the excitation and emission profiles of some or all of the most significant fluorophores contributing to the measured emission.…”
Section: Component Resolution and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2). Considering the structure of equation (3), it is clear that a PARAFAC model is a special case of Tucker3 model with a (F × F × F) tensor T = (t pqr ) having ones in the superdiagonal (t pqr =1 if p=q=r) and zeros outside.…”
Section: /12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative is the use of excitation-emission fluorescence matrices (EEMs) coupled with chemometric methods that exhibit the secondorder property. Thus, the identification and quantification of the analytes of interest are possible even in the presence of non-calibrated interferences [2]. Several chemometric methods with the second-order property have been applied to EEM matrices to solve these difficulties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%