1997
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-60.11.1439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical Approaches to Risk Assessment

Abstract: The aim of microbiological risk assessment is to facilitate decision making at various levels of food safety management. At the personal level, the decision concerns what to eat and what not to eat. Knowledge concerning the potential risks of certain foods and the degree of satisfaction derived from eating a food are important criteria in making the decision. Food suppliers must make the decision for their customers or consumers. They will limit the risk that someone may get ill as much as possible. Hazard ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several tools allow assessment of whether a pathogen may be a source of hazard for a certain food in a specific food process. Differently from semi-quantitative scoring systems and decision trees [ 24 , 25 , 26 ], stepwise approaches [ 27 ], and schemes for qualitative risk assessments [ 28 , 29 ], the Risk Ranger software allows identification of phases where control measures could be effectively implemented. Described in Ross and Sumner [ 30 ], the Risk Ranger software is a calculation tool based on 11 questions that allow attribution of a rank to a specific combination of food and hazard.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Food Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several tools allow assessment of whether a pathogen may be a source of hazard for a certain food in a specific food process. Differently from semi-quantitative scoring systems and decision trees [ 24 , 25 , 26 ], stepwise approaches [ 27 ], and schemes for qualitative risk assessments [ 28 , 29 ], the Risk Ranger software allows identification of phases where control measures could be effectively implemented. Described in Ross and Sumner [ 30 ], the Risk Ranger software is a calculation tool based on 11 questions that allow attribution of a rank to a specific combination of food and hazard.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Food Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Governments need risk assessment in order to select risk management measures for food trade at national and international levels, avoiding risks to the population (Van Schothorst, 1997). But also, risk assessment can be useful at the production level (how to manufacture), at the supplier level (to deliver or not, storage conditions) and at the personal level (to eat or not to eat, or how to prepare a food).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Codex Alimentarius Commission recommendations on food safety and European regulations, management options applied at the process production level should be based on good hygiene practices, HACCP system, and food safety risk management metrics (appropriate level of protection, food safety objective , performance objective, and performance criterion) . To follow this last recommendation, the use of quantitative risk assessment model is an appealing approach to link new risk‐based metrics to management options that may be applied by food operators …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%