Proceedings of 1993 International Conference on Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)
DOI: 10.1109/iccad.1993.580046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical applications of an efficient time separation of events algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been two nice proofs of STARI's correctness [34], [36], but they have been on abstract models. Fig.…”
Section: A Asynchronous Circuit Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been two nice proofs of STARI's correctness [34], [36], but they have been on abstract models. Fig.…”
Section: A Asynchronous Circuit Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been two nice proofs of STARI's correctness [21,23], but they have been on abstract models. In [22], the authors state that COSPAN which uses the unit-cube (or region) technique for timing verification [24] ran out of memory attempting to verify a 3 stage gate-level version of STARI on a machine with 1 GB of memory.…”
Section: Ack(1)precedes X(0)t-and X(0)f-) and (2) A New Data Value mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hulgaard et al observed in [6] that the isochronic fork assumption is too strong, and can be relaxed as follows: the circuit will function correctly as long as forked transitions that do not have a successor transition in the STG (and thus are not acknowledged) occur before they are used later in the execution of the circuit. This can be accomplished by adding causal ∆ i constraints from such fork transitions to the appropriate transitions.…”
Section: F Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 which was reported in [6]. The D-element synchronizes two components that use handshakes to communicate.…”
Section: F Examplementioning
confidence: 99%