1986
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90137-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Powerful and versatile enhancer-promoter unit for mammalian expression vectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
125
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
125
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, the ratio of CAT to LacZ was severalfold lower for vLZCC than for pLZCC. This difference may reflect an effect of the integrative state of the provirus, although this was not observed in mammalian cells (10). For the other six vectors, however, the relative expression of the two genes was not greatly affected by the state of integration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surprisingly, the ratio of CAT to LacZ was severalfold lower for vLZCC than for pLZCC. This difference may reflect an effect of the integrative state of the provirus, although this was not observed in mammalian cells (10). For the other six vectors, however, the relative expression of the two genes was not greatly affected by the state of integration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The relative levels of CAT expression were roughly twofold higher when the cat gene was placed directly at the 3' end of the EMCV IRES (pLZIC2 and -3) than when it was separated by a 29-bp untranslated fragment (pLZIC1) or expressed from the RSV promoter (pLZUC). The highest levels of CAT expression were obtained from the CMV promoter, which was previously shown to be more powerful than the RSV promoter in mammalian expression vectors (10 spliced message was only 5 to 10% that of the IRES vectors. There was no CAT expression from the 232-bp EMCV fragment of pLZAIC, which confirms the requirement of an IRES for internal initiation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 To study the role of CD46 in Ad35 vector-mediated transduction into human bone marrow CD34 + cells, we evaluated the relationship between CD46 expression levels and the transduction efficiencies of Ad35 vector containing the CMV promoter. The CMV promoter is generally regarded as one of the most powerful Optimization of promoter in Ad35 vectors into human hematopoietic progenitors F Sakurai et al promoters 24 and is widely used in transduction experiments. As shown in Figure 2a, almost all the bone marrow CD34 + cells expressed high levels of CD46, similar to the cord blood CD34 + cells.…”
Section: Construction Of E1/e3-deleted Ad35 Vectors By the Improved Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CMV promoter is the most commonly used promoter in mammalian expression plasmids (Boshart et al, 1985;Foecking and Hofstetter, 1986;Hundt et al, 2009) but has been shown to be active in a broad range of cell types as has simian virus 40 (Robbins and Ghivizzani, 1998;Kimchi-Sarfaty et al, 2003;Park et al, 2004). RSV long terminal repeat, which is activated by the growth factor ligands of tyrosine kinase receptors (Cosgaya et al, 1997), is often used to enhance gene expression (Machon et al, 1998;Majhen et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%