Endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) nomenclature remains ambiguous and there is a general lack of concordance in the stem cell field with many distinct cell sub-types continually grouped under the term “EPC”. It would be highly advantageous to agree standards to confirm an endothelial progenitor phenotype and this should include detailed immunophenotyping, potency assays, and clear separation from haematopoietic angiogenic cells which are not endothelial progenitors. In this review, we seek to discourage the indiscriminate use of ‘EPCs’, and instead propose precise terminology based on defining cellular phenotype and function. Endothelial colony forming cells (ECFCs) and myeloid angiogenic cells (MACs) are examples of two distinct and well-defined cell types that have been considered ‘EPCs’ because they both promote vascular repair, albeit by completely different mechanisms of action. It is acknowledged that scientific nomenclature should be a dynamic process driven by technological and conceptual advances; ergo the ongoing ‘EPC’ nomenclature ought not to be permanent and should become more precise in the light of strong scientific evidence. This is especially important as these cells become recognised for their role in vascular repair in health and disease; and, in some cases, progress towards use in cell therapy.

The neonatal FcR (FcRn) binds to the Fc domain of IgG at acidic pH in the endosome and protects IgG from degradation, thereby contributing to the long serum half-life of IgG. To date, more than 20 mAb products and 5 Fc-fusion protein products have received marketing authorization approval in the United States, the European Union, or Japan. Many of these therapeutic proteins have the Fc domain of human IgG1; however, the serum half-lives differ in each protein. To elucidate the role of FcRn in the pharmacokinetics of Fc domain-containing therapeutic proteins, we evaluated the affinity of the clinically used human, humanized, chimeric, or mouse mAbs and Fc-fusion proteins to recombinant human FcRn by surface plasmon resonance analysis. The affinities of these therapeutic proteins to FcRn were found to be closely correlated with the serum half-lives reported from clinical studies, suggesting the important role of FcRn in regulating their serum half-lives. The relatively short serum half-life of Fc-fusion proteins was thought to arise from the low affinity to FcRn. The existence of some mAbs having high affinity to FcRn and a short serum half-life, however, suggested the involvement of other critical factor(s) in determining the serum half-life of such Abs. We further investigated the reason for the relatively low affinity of Fc-fusion proteins to FcRn and suggested the possibility that the receptor domain of Fc-fusion protein influences the structural environment of the FcRn binding region but not of the FcγRI binding region of the Fc domain.

The ectopic expression of transcription factors can reprogram differentiated tissue cells into induced pluripotent stem cells. However, this is a slow and inefficient process, depending on the simultaneous delivery of multiple genes encoding essential reprogramming factors and on their sustained expression in target cells. Moreover, once cell reprogramming is accomplished, these exogenous reprogramming factors should be replaced with their endogenous counterparts for establishing autoregulated pluripotency. Complete and designed removal of the exogenous genes from the reprogrammed cells would be an ideal option for satisfying this latter requisite as well as for minimizing the risk of malignant cell transformation. However, no single gene delivery/expression system has ever been equipped with these contradictory characteristics. Here we report the development of a novel replication-defective and persistent Sendai virus (SeVdp) vector based on a noncytopathic variant virus, which fulfills all of these requirements for cell reprogramming. The SeVdp vector could accommodate up to four exogenous genes, deliver them efficiently into various mammalian cells (including primary tissue cells and human hematopoietic stem cells) and express them stably in the cytoplasm at a prefixed balance. Furthermore, interfering with viral transcription/replication using siRNA could erase the genomic RNA of SeVdp vector from the target cells quickly and thoroughly. A SeVdp vector installed with Oct4/Sox2/Klf4/c-Myc could reprogram mouse primary fibroblasts quite efficiently; ϳ1% of the cells were reprogrammed to Nanog-positive induced pluripotent stem cells without chromosomal gene integration. Thus, this SeVdp vector has potential as a tool for advanced cell reprogramming and for stem cell research. The generation of induced pluripotent stem (iPS)3 cells by reprogramming tissue cells with defined factors opened the door for realizing the medical application of patient-derived engineered stem cells (1). iPS cells were established originally by the ectopic expression of multiple transcription factors (e.g. Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc) using a retroviral vector (1). Since then, researchers have established iPS cells by several different approaches (and by their combination), including gene transfer, protein transduction, and treatment with chemical compounds (2). However, because of superior reproducibility and efficacy, ectopic expression of reprogramming factors by gene transfer is still the primary method of choice.Various lines of evidence indicate that efficient cell reprogramming requires the sustained and simultaneous expression of several (usually 4) exogenous factors for at least 10 -20 days (3). On the other hand, after reprogramming has been completed, these exogenous factors should be replaced promptly with their endogenous counterparts if the cells are to acquire autoregulated pluripotency (3). For this reason, retroviral and lentiviral vectors have been used preferentially; chromosomal insertion of the vector genome allow...

No abstract

No abstract