2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41551-020-0595-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power-saving design opportunities for wireless intracortical brain–computer interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
70
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There are three main sources of noise in neural recordings: electrode impedance thermal noise, tissue thermal noise and interface electronics noise 84 . Of the three, only interface electronics noise is likely to contain correlated power across different frequency bands.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three main sources of noise in neural recordings: electrode impedance thermal noise, tissue thermal noise and interface electronics noise 84 . Of the three, only interface electronics noise is likely to contain correlated power across different frequency bands.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decoders built on multiunit thresholds can also be maintained over long periods [4], [7], [36] and population dynamics may be estimated from multiunit threshold crossings without spike sorting [37]. An analysis of iBCI decoding in monkeys and humans proposes that digital sampling at 1 kHz should be sufficient for iBCI applications [21]. These approaches could reduce the wireless bandwidth by roughly an order of magnitude, thereby simplifying the engineering design constraints for a fully implanted wireless iBCI or, alternatively, freeing bandwidth to record from thousands of electrode contacts [38]- [43].…”
Section: A Design Trade-offsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, wireless recording for iBCI has yet to be demonstrated in people, in part because translating the proven cabled system (16 bits per sample at 30 kS/s for each of 96 electrodes per implanted array) to wireless form presents significant engineering challenges. Although wireless broadband signal acquisition might not be a design requirement for some targeted iBCI applications [ 21 23 ], broadcasting the entire broadband signal allows for investigation of novel iBCI algorithms spanning the full spectrum of neural activity while supporting a wide range of fundamental electrophysiological research during untethered use. With this motivation and the goal of enabling continuous, independent use of an iBCI, previous work from our team created a compact, power efficient neurosensor that digitizes and wirelessly transmits broadband cortical activity from a 96-channel chronically implanted microelectrode array [ 24 – 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common first approach when dealing with neuronal recording is to select a specific signal band that is typically for extracellular action potentials within 300 to 5 kHz so as to reduce both low and high frequency noise [27]. Here, as mentioned, a 2nd IIR Butterworth filters is used with a bandwidth of 300 Hz-3 kHz, to remove the low frequency noise characterized by LFP, the offset and the off-band noise.…”
Section: Band-pass Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%