2021
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2021.3069119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home Use of a Percutaneous Wireless Intracortical Brain-Computer Interface by Individuals With Tetraplegia

Abstract: Objective. Individuals with neurological disease or injury such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, spinal cord injury or stroke may become tetraplegic, unable to speak or even locked-in. For people with these conditions, current assistive technologies are often ineffective. Brain-computer interfaces are being developed to enhance independence and restore communication in the absence of physical movement. Over the past decade, individuals with tetraplegia have achieved rapid on-screen typing and pointand-click c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, the first wireless invasive BMI has been demonstrated in humans [85]. The interface had 192 electrodes, with 20 kSamples/s per electrode (12 bits per sample).…”
Section: B Wireless-based Brain-machine Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the first wireless invasive BMI has been demonstrated in humans [85]. The interface had 192 electrodes, with 20 kSamples/s per electrode (12 bits per sample).…”
Section: B Wireless-based Brain-machine Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 If, instead, the goal is to continuously estimate detailed information about the movement intended by a paralyzed subject, the motor-decoding module will typically use an intracortical-implanted electrode as microelectrode arrays that record from large populations of neurons. [12][13][14] Recent developments in brain implants have been toward the use of wireless technologies, [15][16][17][18] the increase in recording sites, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] a reduction in power consumption, 26 the stability of the electrodes, and the biocompatibility 27,28 and integration of closed-loop recordings and stimulations (see Kohler et al 5 for a review). Independent of the electrode and signal type, all algorithms implement similar architectures.…”
Section: Decoding Brain Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel, research-grade devices are beginning to fill these gaps. Brain computer interfaces for patients with tetraplegia, for example, have also fostered advances in implanted technologies for chronic brain recordings (Simeral et al, 2021 ). Multifunctional research platforms that integrate these emerging devices with wireless stimulation control, peripheral biosensors, and environmental features as in virtual reality should further guide and inform the next generation of clinical hardware (Topalovic et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Clinical Technologies For Ambulatory Invasive Electrophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%