2003
DOI: 10.1111/j.1430-9134.2003.00001.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power in the Firm and Managerial Career Concerns

Abstract: With more power, a manager can make more decisions or more important ones, and in this way have more impact on his firm. As a consequence, firm performance provides more information about the abilities of more powerful managers, who are more "visible". In this paper I analyze how the allocation of power in the firm affects the managers' career concerns when no manager's power can be increased without reducing another manager's. I show that, with a simple linear technology and risk-neutral managers, it is gener… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 To be certain, commercial companies leave Application Programming Interfaces for other people to provide add-ons, but this is still quite di¡erent from opening the source code. 20 On the relationship between empowerment and career concerns, see Ortega [2000]. In Cassiman's [1998] analysis of research corporations (for-pro¢t centers bringing together ¢rms with similar research goals), free riding by parent companies boosts the researchers' autonomy and helps attracting better talents.…”
Section: Iii(iv) Sendmailmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 To be certain, commercial companies leave Application Programming Interfaces for other people to provide add-ons, but this is still quite di¡erent from opening the source code. 20 On the relationship between empowerment and career concerns, see Ortega [2000]. In Cassiman's [1998] analysis of research corporations (for-pro¢t centers bringing together ¢rms with similar research goals), free riding by parent companies boosts the researchers' autonomy and helps attracting better talents.…”
Section: Iii(iv) Sendmailmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Possibilities range from refusing to inspect another's code, to not inspecting another's code rigorously to either help a co-worker or prevent retaliation, to re-defining what the exact definition of a ''defect'' is to their own benefit. 14 See Holmströ m (1982), Gibbons and Murphy (1992), Dewatripont et al (1999), Jeon (1996), Auriol et al (2002), Ortega (2003), Auriol et al (2002), Meyers and Vickers (1997), Baliga and Sjostrom (2001), and Lazear (1989).…”
Section: Overview Of a Model Of Peer Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast to this article, most of these works assume no information asymmetry between the current and the prospective employers. (See also Scharfstein and Stein, 1990;Gibbons and Murphy, 1992;Jeon, 1996;Ortega, 2003. ) Informational asymmetry between current and future employers opens up a role for strategic information transmission.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%