2015
DOI: 10.1109/joe.2014.2356936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power Control of a Nonpitchable PMSG-Based Marine Current Turbine at Overrated Current Speed With Flux-Weakening Strategy

Abstract: is an open access repository that collects the work of Arts et Métiers ParisTech researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible. Abstract-This

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where, p is the number of pole pairs of the generator, and λ m is the magnetic flux linkage due to PM. On the other hand, flux weakening strategy is utilized if i d = 0 results in a higher terminal voltage than can be delivered by the converter [43]. The d-axis current i d , is obtained as follows,…”
Section: Generator Speed Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, p is the number of pole pairs of the generator, and λ m is the magnetic flux linkage due to PM. On the other hand, flux weakening strategy is utilized if i d = 0 results in a higher terminal voltage than can be delivered by the converter [43]. The d-axis current i d , is obtained as follows,…”
Section: Generator Speed Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it can be seen, OCAES will be quickly fully charged because of the high energy provided by the MCT farm. However, in this case, the MCT cannot be kept in MPPT operation when the OCAES charging power reaches its rated value at 2.69 h or 14.82 h; MCT control can limit the generated power to protect the OCAES from the over charge and maintain the stability of the grid [20]. When the OCAES is fully charged at 4.28 h or 16.81 h, the MCT limits the generated power to the load only.…”
Section: Higher or Lower Tide Speed Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, HOSM controllers appear to have high frequency oscillations around the sliding mode creating a possible problem for the operation of the generator. The same controller designed in [38] is also used in [39] Other variations in controlling a PMSG are presented in [40] using passive rectifiers and in [41] using a fixed pitch blade tidal current turbine. Researchers in [42] perform dynamic stability analysis to a grid connected tidal current turbine with PMSG.…”
Section: Control Of Tidal Current Turbinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the main disadvantage of this design is the previous knowledge of the resource that is required which is not always possible to acquire and may not be accurate. In [41] authors are trying to regulate the power of a non-pitchable tidal current turbine. In order to achieve power regulation they use a flux-weakening control strategy which is presented in Figure 2 The flux weakening control strategy can be controlled in two different modes.…”
Section: Control Of Tidal Current Turbinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation