“…The calculation was carried out as follows: [5,12,24], and presented as a function of impeller interspacing, H, and d i /d T [24]. Although torque measurement is a more reliable method for power input determination, this was not considered within our study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Henzler [5] and Markopoulos [12], a correction on Np due to impeller spacing is needed for both bioreactors since h/d T < 0.75 [5] and h < 1.65 d i [12]. This correction was calculated according to Hudcova et al [24], who showed a relationship for power number ratio Np 2 /Np 1 and the ratio of impeller interspacing to tank diameter h/d T in two impeller systems.…”
Development of bioprocesses with mammalian cell culture deals with different bioreactor types and scales. The bioreactors might be intended for generation of cell inoculum and production, research, process development, validation, or transfer purposes. During these activities, not only the difficulty of up and downscaling might lead to failure of consistency in cell growth, but also the use of different bioreactor geometries and operation conditions. In such cases, criteria for bioreactor design and process transfer should be carefully evaluated in order to select appropriate cultivation parameters.
In this work, power input, mixing time, impeller tip speed, and Reynolds number have been compared systematically for the cultivation of the human cell line AGE1.HN within three partner laboratories using five different bioreactor systems. Proper operation ranges for the bioreactors were identified using the maximal cell‐specific growth rate (μmax) as indicator. Common optimum values for process transfer criteria were found in these geometrically different bioreactors, in which deviations of μmax between cultivation systems can be importantly reduced. The data obtained in this work are used for process standardization and comparability of results obtained in different bioreactor systems, i.e. to guarantee lab‐to‐lab consistency for systems biology approaches using mammalian cells.
“…The calculation was carried out as follows: [5,12,24], and presented as a function of impeller interspacing, H, and d i /d T [24]. Although torque measurement is a more reliable method for power input determination, this was not considered within our study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Henzler [5] and Markopoulos [12], a correction on Np due to impeller spacing is needed for both bioreactors since h/d T < 0.75 [5] and h < 1.65 d i [12]. This correction was calculated according to Hudcova et al [24], who showed a relationship for power number ratio Np 2 /Np 1 and the ratio of impeller interspacing to tank diameter h/d T in two impeller systems.…”
Development of bioprocesses with mammalian cell culture deals with different bioreactor types and scales. The bioreactors might be intended for generation of cell inoculum and production, research, process development, validation, or transfer purposes. During these activities, not only the difficulty of up and downscaling might lead to failure of consistency in cell growth, but also the use of different bioreactor geometries and operation conditions. In such cases, criteria for bioreactor design and process transfer should be carefully evaluated in order to select appropriate cultivation parameters.
In this work, power input, mixing time, impeller tip speed, and Reynolds number have been compared systematically for the cultivation of the human cell line AGE1.HN within three partner laboratories using five different bioreactor systems. Proper operation ranges for the bioreactors were identified using the maximal cell‐specific growth rate (μmax) as indicator. Common optimum values for process transfer criteria were found in these geometrically different bioreactors, in which deviations of μmax between cultivation systems can be importantly reduced. The data obtained in this work are used for process standardization and comparability of results obtained in different bioreactor systems, i.e. to guarantee lab‐to‐lab consistency for systems biology approaches using mammalian cells.
“…At an impeller spacing of DH ³ 2 d, for impeller diameters d = 0.06 and d = 0.08 m, and DH ³ 1.54 d, for impeller diameter d = 0.10 m, the double-stage Rushton turbines give a slightly better gas dispersion than the single turbines at the same rotational speed. However, as reported in the literature [16,17], for these impeller spacing, the two impellers are acting independently and the power drawn by the double impellers is approximately twice that of the single impeller systems. So the slightly better dispersion conditions, observed in the double impeller systems, cannot be regarded from first sight as advantageous.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the method used was estimated to be better than 10 %. A detailed presentation of the experimental set-up is given in previous work [16].…”
“…These aerated agitated tanks can be equipped with a number of different or identical impellers. These multi‐impeller mixing systems can provide a higher bubble surface area per unit volume, more uniform distribution of the shear rate within the tank, and a higher gas utilization rate . Nonetheless, previous studies demonstrated that traditional mixers which were equipped with multiple agitators located on the same shaft still show some failures to distribute the gas evenly throughout tanks containing viscous Newtonian and non‐Newtonian fluids.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.