2011
DOI: 10.1109/tce.2011.6131136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power-aware optimal checkpoint intervals for mobile consumer devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lifetime-oriented power management Several lifetime-oriented power management (PM) schemes [6]- [9] have been proposed to guarantee a target lifetime for battery-limited devices. Different from performance-centric PM schemes [2]- [5], these PM schemes are energy-centric in the sense that energy, instead of CPU or transmission bandwidth, is managed by the OS as the first-class resource in mobile systems. Neugebauer et al [7] and Flinn et al [9] demonstrated that a target lifetime can be achieved if the applications can self-adapt their energy demands based on the residual energy in the battery.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lifetime-oriented power management Several lifetime-oriented power management (PM) schemes [6]- [9] have been proposed to guarantee a target lifetime for battery-limited devices. Different from performance-centric PM schemes [2]- [5], these PM schemes are energy-centric in the sense that energy, instead of CPU or transmission bandwidth, is managed by the OS as the first-class resource in mobile systems. Neugebauer et al [7] and Flinn et al [9] demonstrated that a target lifetime can be achieved if the applications can self-adapt their energy demands based on the residual energy in the battery.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased complexity and functionality in many consumer electronic (CE) devices has motivated a transformation of system usefulness assessment from a quality of service (QoS) approach to a quality of experience (QoE) approach [1], [2]. In the meantime, due to the increasing energy demand of applications and the relentless trend to make the battery lighter and smaller in CE devices, energy in modern mobile systems has become a limited resource as important as the CPU, memory and network [5]- [7]. When a user is running multiple applications with different preferences on a battery-limited mobile device, such as a laptop or a tablet, usually he or she has a requirement concerning how long the battery needs to last for the most-preferred applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows an example of mode changes of our system. Our energy consumption model is similar to the ones used in [14,7]. Activation and deactivation of the wireless interface requires additional time and energy as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Energy-efficient Data Transmission Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is the problem of batteries due to the limitations of physical resources in mobile terminal devices. If energy is also considered when peers of high contribution within the system are first given free patching and are allocated to the source node during streaming service delivery, stable service can be provided, control signals due to re-peering caused by battery discharge can be reduced, and the overall energy can be saved through reducing control request messages that are consecutively generated within the system [8]. Mobile system saving-related apps, which quit or temporarily suspend unimportant background apps so as to extend battery life, have been popular recently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%