2008 17th Asian Test Symposium 2008
DOI: 10.1109/ats.2008.86
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power Analysis and Reduction Techniques for Transition Fault Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, a wrong test response may be captured in the capture cycle and delivered to the external test equipment (ATE) [5], [6]. Dedicated low capture-power (LCP) aware ATPG causes a significant test pattern count increase with impact on test time and cost [11]. X-filling, a test set post-processing method, is a very successful approach to reduce capture-power by assigning appropriate binary values to unspecified signals (Xbits) in the test cubes such that switching activity in the launch cycle is reduced [12], [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, a wrong test response may be captured in the capture cycle and delivered to the external test equipment (ATE) [5], [6]. Dedicated low capture-power (LCP) aware ATPG causes a significant test pattern count increase with impact on test time and cost [11]. X-filling, a test set post-processing method, is a very successful approach to reduce capture-power by assigning appropriate binary values to unspecified signals (Xbits) in the test cubes such that switching activity in the launch cycle is reduced [12], [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, LOS can achieve higher fault coverage and a smaller test vector count. Therefore, LOS has advantages in terms of the test quality and test cost [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%