2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cossms.2016.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Powder bed binder jet 3D printing of Inconel 718: Densification, microstructural evolution and challenges☆

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Center‐notched rectangular panel specimens were fabricated on an ExOne Innovent binder jet 3D printer according to the design shown in Figure . In the binder jetting process, objects are built layer‐by‐layer by joining powder feedstock with an organic binder . First, a layer of powder material is dispensed from a hopper onto the build surface, then smoothed by a rotating drum known as the recoater.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Center‐notched rectangular panel specimens were fabricated on an ExOne Innovent binder jet 3D printer according to the design shown in Figure . In the binder jetting process, objects are built layer‐by‐layer by joining powder feedstock with an organic binder . First, a layer of powder material is dispensed from a hopper onto the build surface, then smoothed by a rotating drum known as the recoater.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RTM ratio of this approach is ≈0.1 × 10 −3 m 2 min −1 . Binder jetting is commonly used for the production of metal or ceramic parts with highly complex geometries . While 3D printing has been synonymized colloquially with many AM techniques, the term should be used to describe binder jetting technologies that solidify a 2D pattern of powder‐based material in sequential layers to form a 3D object.…”
Section: Toolbox For Am Of Precision Biomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On average, the volume fraction of these phases decreases with increasing cooling rate in the melt pool and typically varies between ≈ 2 % and 20 % in experiments [63][64][65][66]. The size and distribution of the secondary phases precipitation in the matrix determine the tensile strength, fracture toughness, and fatigue properties of the solidified material [67]. A finer size and discrete distribution of those phases are beneficial compared to a coarser and continuous distribution, when resistance to deformation is considered [63][64][65][66].…”
Section: Precipitation Of Solid Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%