2014
DOI: 10.1108/igdr-03-2014-0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poverty by social, religious and economic groups in India and its largest states

Abstract: Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to ground in serious empirical evidence the debate on whether the post-reform acceleration in growth has helped bring poverty down for all economic, social and religious groups and in all state or has left certain groups or states.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite robust growth, the Gini coefficient for India (the most frequently recognized measurement of economic inequity) shows an increasing trend since the 1990s in income inequality (from 30.8% to 33.9%) laid over existing large variation in poverty rates among social groups (by tribe, caste, and religion) in India and across states (Panagariya, ). If we turn to health, whereas on average, health outcomes have improved, the gains are not even.…”
Section: The Persistence Of Inequities With the Example Of Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite robust growth, the Gini coefficient for India (the most frequently recognized measurement of economic inequity) shows an increasing trend since the 1990s in income inequality (from 30.8% to 33.9%) laid over existing large variation in poverty rates among social groups (by tribe, caste, and religion) in India and across states (Panagariya, ). If we turn to health, whereas on average, health outcomes have improved, the gains are not even.…”
Section: The Persistence Of Inequities With the Example Of Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 It is estimated that 30% of people belonging to SCs live below the poverty line of ∼30Rs (∼US$ 0.45) a day, with the majority living in slums or segregated villages. 10,12 SC women often face triple discrimination due to their caste, socio-economic status and gender, and these problems have previously been reflected in poor maternal health outcomes. 8,9 There is no recent available data comparing national maternal outcomes between castes, but smaller-scale studies show a continued strong relationship between caste and MMR/reproductive morbidity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, 31•5% of individuals from scheduled castes and 45•3% from scheduled tribes still live in poverty; these figures are above the national average according to the Suresh Tendulkar Committee's estimate of poverty in India. 2 The global population living in poverty has declined in the past 15 years to approximately 1 billion people. 3 4 People on low-incomes are more affected by climate change.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%