Potentials of Entrepreneurial Design Thinking® for Entrepreneurship Education

Kortzfleisch, Harald F. O. von; Zerwas, Dorothée; Mokanis, Ilias

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.237

Cited by 22 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Electives are found in family firms, social entrepreneurship, and specific technology areas of focus. More recently, ‘design thinking’ has also entered the entrepreneurship curriculum (Linton & Klinton, 2019; Von Kortzfleisch et al, 2013). At the graduate level, there are commonly masters programmes, an entrepreneurship track within the MBA, or shorter form entrepreneurship certificates.…”

Section: Endogenous Ecosystem Assessment Dimensions: Areas Universitymentioning

confidence: 99%

An Assessment and Planning Methodology for University-Based: Entrepreneurship Ecosystems

Meyer

Lee

Kelley

et al. 2020

The Journal of Entrepreneurship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper proposes a method for assessing a university-based entrepreneurship ecosystem, grounded in the identification of major stakeholders, entrepreneurship-related activities directly related to those stakeholders, and with an eye to more comprehensive experiential entrepreneurship education that goes beyond traditional classroom education. The method incorporates specific approaches with each major activity area as well as outcomes, which are then aggregated into overall ecosystem strategy and performance. The paper concludes with an approach to action planning and resource allocation staging for university officials and supporting government bodies.

show abstract

Section: Endogenous Ecosystem Assessment Dimensions: Areas Universitymentioning

confidence: 99%

An Assessment and Planning Methodology for University-Based: Entrepreneurship Ecosystems

Meyer

Lee

Kelley

et al. 2020

The Journal of Entrepreneurship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The similarities between the two categories of identity make Press and Cooper () depict the designer as an opportunistic entrepreneur; Sarasvathy, Dew, Read, and Wiltbank () and Selden and Fletcher () refer to entrepreneurship as a process of designing new artefacts; Venkataraman, Sarasvathy, Dew, and Forster () link opportunities and design; and Boland, Collophy, Lyytinen, and Yoo () perceive the entrepreneur as a sort of design manager. O'Grady () directly assimilates design and entrepreneurship, Von Kortzfleisch et al () suggest the term ‘entrepreneurial design thinking’, and Dimov () develops the design science of entrepreneurship.…”

Section: Designers Are Entrepreneurs and Vice Versamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…O'Grady (2012) directly assimilates design and entrepreneurship, Von Kortzfleisch et al (2013) suggest the term 'entrepreneurial design thinking', and Dimov (2016) develops the design science of entrepreneurship.…”

Section: Designers Are Entrepreneurs and Vice Versamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There is an increasing focus on design and design thinking as attractive platforms for improving entrepreneurship education and training programmes, particularly to stimulate the creative side of entrepreneurship (e.g. Huq & Gilbert, 2017;Lahn & Erikson, 2016;Von Kortzfleisch, Zerwas, & Mokanis, 2013). At the same time, knowledge is surprisingly sparse as concerns the teaching and training of entrepreneurship to creative people (Beckman, 2007;Bridgstock, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

‘Salesman? Hell no!’ Identity struggles of nascent design entrepreneurs

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study offers new input to the discussion of how entrepreneurship education and training programmes can be tailored to suit design professionals. To a large extent, existing entrepreneurship teaching for creative people is based on a traditional administrative management logic that often results in a clash between entrepreneurial demands and creative identities. The paper is based on the following rationale: the better we understand designers' reasoning and their struggles concerning becoming entrepreneurs, the better we are able to design entrepreneurship learning experiences that meet their needs. Since designers' career‐making tends to be highly driven by their strong sense of identity, the paper takes an identity perspective. The empirical foundation of the research is based on observation studies and phenomenological interviews conducted during an eight‐week entrepreneurship training program. Twenty‐five nascent design entrepreneurs with a professional background as designers participated in the voluntary programme. The paper offers novel and critical insights into designers' experiences of the entrepreneurial identity and reasoning as they participate in entrepreneurship training.

show abstract

“…Peneliti sebelumnya telah mengkaji hubungan pendidikan kewirausahaan dan intensi kewirausahaan. Von Kortzfleisch, et al (2013) menyatakan entrepreneur design thinking berpengaruh terhadap peningkatan pendidikan kewirausahaan. Cheng, et al (2009) menyatakan pengetahuan tentang kewirausahaan dan minat memulai usaha tidak berhubungan secara signifikan, disebabkan metode penyampaian pembelajaran kewirausahaan yang digunakan tidak efektif.…”

Section: Intensi Kewirausahaanunclassified

Pendidikan Kewirausahaan dan Intensi Kewirausahaan dengan Sikap Kewirausahaan sebagai Mediasi

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AbstractThis study aimed to analyze the entrepreneurial attitude as a mediator of the effects of entrepreneurial education on entrepreneurial intention. The population was final semester students who studied entrepreneurial education and the sampling technique used is judgment sampling. The primary data was collected through questionnaires distribution and analyzed using path analysis. The results show that the effect of entrepreneurial education toward the entrepreneurial intention is not significant; the influence of entrepreneurial attitude toward the entrepreneurial intention is significant; and the students who studied entrepreneurship education tend to have intentions to establish a new business if entrepreneurial education can form positive mindset towards entrepreneurship.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis peran sikap kewirausahaan sebagai variabel mediasi untuk pengaruh pendidikan kewirausahaan terhadap intensi kewirausahaan. Populasi penelitian adalah mahasiswa semester akhir yang telah mendapat pendidikan kewirausahaan dan teknik sampling menggunakan judgment sampling. Pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner dan analisis data menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan analisis jalur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaruh pendidikan kewirausahaan terhadap intensi kewirausahaan positif tetapi tidak signifikan; Pengaruh sikap kewirausahaan terhadap intensi kewirausahaan positif dan signifikan; dan mahasiswa yang mengikuti pendidikan kewirausahaan cenderung berniat mendirikan usaha baru dimasa mendatang, apabila pendidikan kewirausahaan dapat membentuk pola pikir positif mahasiswa terhadap kewirausahaan.

show abstract

Potentials of Entrepreneurial Design Thinking® for Entrepreneurship Education

Cited by 22 publications

References 24 publications

An Assessment and Planning Methodology for University-Based: Entrepreneurship Ecosystems

An Assessment and Planning Methodology for University-Based: Entrepreneurship Ecosystems

‘Salesman? Hell no!’ Identity struggles of nascent design entrepreneurs

Pendidikan Kewirausahaan dan Intensi Kewirausahaan dengan Sikap Kewirausahaan sebagai Mediasi

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About