2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-09895-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potentially toxic elements in the Middle East oldest oil refinery zone soils: source apportionment, speciation, bioaccessibility and human health risk assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The enrichment of the HMs was quantified using the modified enrichment factor (MEF) given by Eq. ( 1 ) 33 , 34 : where C i and C ref are the concentration of the target (usually concentration of HMs in the polluted samples) and reference elements (mean concentration of HMs in the control samples) respectively 33 . T results were classified in accordance with 33 where EF (< 2) values corresponds to minimal enrichment, values (2–5) = moderate enrichment, (5–20) = significant enrichment, (20–40) = very high enrichment and values (> 40) = extremely high enrichment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The enrichment of the HMs was quantified using the modified enrichment factor (MEF) given by Eq. ( 1 ) 33 , 34 : where C i and C ref are the concentration of the target (usually concentration of HMs in the polluted samples) and reference elements (mean concentration of HMs in the control samples) respectively 33 . T results were classified in accordance with 33 where EF (< 2) values corresponds to minimal enrichment, values (2–5) = moderate enrichment, (5–20) = significant enrichment, (20–40) = very high enrichment and values (> 40) = extremely high enrichment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 2 ). The MPI presents convenient and reliable method of assessing the degree or amount of contamination of a given sample of soil using the MEF values 33 . …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Source apportionment can not only determine the main pollution sources, but also quantify the contribution of pollution sources [10]. At present, the most common source-apportionment methods for heavy metals include the chemical mass balance (CMB) model [26], positive matrix factor (PMF) model [27], UNMIX model [28], the absolute principle-component scores multiple linear regression (APCS-MLR) model [29], etc. The PMF model recommended by EPA can guarantee non-negative factor distribution and contribution and deal with the missing and inaccurate values [12]; therefore, it is extensively used in the quantitative apportionment of pollutant sources [30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mining activities have had a considerable role in the pollution of the environment and are one of the most important point-source of soil and water contamination (García-Carmona et al 2017;Zhu et al 2019). In particular, metal mining can cause serious health risks as metals are usually toxic at low concentrations and not degradable, thus remaining in soil and water environments for long periods (Alloway 2013;Langård 2015;Padoan et al 2019;Rafiee et al 2020;Mokhtarzadeh et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%