PsycEXTRA Dataset 2011
DOI: 10.1037/e707652011-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potentiality States in Analogy Problem Solving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We suspect that (contrary to the article), evaluation may be as spontaneous as generation. The separation of generative activation and evaluation in NSM stems from adopting the view that creators generate as many solutions as possible and then choose the best, a view that is inconsistent with the results of studies of analogy making and artmaking (Carbert, Gabora, Schwartz, & Ranjan, 2014;Gabora & Saab, 2011;Scotney, Schwartz, Carbert, Adam Saab, & Gabora, 2020). Even when a creator generates multiple possibilities (e.g., multiple sketches for a painting) and chooses one, these seemingly distinct possibilities may be just different ways of expressing a single underlying idea that the creator is wrestling with (Gabora, 2019;Gabora & Steel, 2022), and in so doing, forging their personal creative style (Gabora, O'Connor, & Ranjan, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suspect that (contrary to the article), evaluation may be as spontaneous as generation. The separation of generative activation and evaluation in NSM stems from adopting the view that creators generate as many solutions as possible and then choose the best, a view that is inconsistent with the results of studies of analogy making and artmaking (Carbert, Gabora, Schwartz, & Ranjan, 2014;Gabora & Saab, 2011;Scotney, Schwartz, Carbert, Adam Saab, & Gabora, 2020). Even when a creator generates multiple possibilities (e.g., multiple sketches for a painting) and chooses one, these seemingly distinct possibilities may be just different ways of expressing a single underlying idea that the creator is wrestling with (Gabora, 2019;Gabora & Steel, 2022), and in so doing, forging their personal creative style (Gabora, O'Connor, & Ranjan, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%