Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11244-007-0182-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential rare-earth modified CeO2 catalysts for soot oxidation

Abstract: The physico-chemical properties of ceria (CeO 2 ) and rare earth modified ceria (with La, Pr, Sm, Y) catalysts are studied and correlated with the soot oxidation activity with using O 2 and O 2 +NO. CeO 2 modified with La and Pr shows superior soot oxidation activity with O 2 compared with the unmodified catalyst. The improved soot oxidation activity of rare earth doped CeO 2 catalysts can be correlated to the increased meso/micro pore volume and the stabilisation of the external surface area. On the other han… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the presence of oxygen vacancies in the CZ and CH samples were identified from Raman and UV-Vis DRS studies. These results correlate with the activity measurements and are in line with earlier reports [21,25,28]. There seems to be a similarity in the behaviour of ceriabased catalysts for oxidation of CO and the soot.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, the presence of oxygen vacancies in the CZ and CH samples were identified from Raman and UV-Vis DRS studies. These results correlate with the activity measurements and are in line with earlier reports [21,25,28]. There seems to be a similarity in the behaviour of ceriabased catalysts for oxidation of CO and the soot.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Loose contact did not show a significant decrease in the soot oxidation temperature irrespective of the catalyst employed, which was in agreement with earlier reports [20][21][22]. Apparently, when the soot particle is not in close contact with the catalyst surface, the active oxygen cannot be transferred to the soot particle [25,27,28]. The active oxygen involved for soot combustion comes from two ways: the gaseous oxygen and the oxygen released from the bulk of the catalysts.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is also easy to find that the catalytic activity of CRX is similar to that of ZRX under loose contact condition, but it is remarkable better under tight contact condition, which can be explained by this reason as well. It it notable that a more detailed study was recently carried out by Makkee et al [30]. They pointed out that the meso/micro pore a Calculation method was presented in [23] b Obtained by dividing the CO 2 produced in 2nd CO pulse by the time scale 5s c For CRS, since the surface oxygen had not been totally consumed during the 1st CO pulse, the left surface oxygen was subtracted from the CO 2 production in the 2nd CO pulse when calculating the oxygen release rate …”
Section: Relationship Between Surface Area and Soot Oxidationmentioning
confidence: 99%