Abstract:BackgroundThe quality and viability of mastectomy flaps remain a central challenge in reconstructive surgery, particularly for immediate breast reconstruction. Insufficient perfusion in tissue flaps is a leading cause of early complications following reconstructive procedures, and clinical judgment alone is not completely reliable for the assessment of flap viability. Accurate and reliable intraoperative methods for assessment of tissue perfusion are needed to help surgeons identify tissue at risk for ischemia… Show more
“…1). After detailed examination of 30 full‐text articles, 18 studies7
19, 20
28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, including 2077 patients, were included in this review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One was to compare rates of mastectomy necrosis and other complications, such as reoperation rates, and clinical outcomes between the techniques used ( Table
1). Seven case series7
28, 29, 30, 31, 32
34 and one cohort study33 used this approach. The alternative approach in seven prospective cohort studies19
20, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 was to evaluate flap perfusion using the intraoperative modalities and to record the predicted areas of necrosis using photographic documentation or video recording.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mastectomy flap necrosis rates were compared with clinical judgement in seven7
28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 studies using ICGA, one study using FA33 and one pilot study using ODIS34. Use of ICGA in 652 and FA in 34 breasts resulted in a decrease in mean mastectomy flap necrosis compared with clinical judgement in 1964 breasts (7·9 and 3 compared with 19·4 per cent) ( Table
3).…”
BackgroundAccurate prediction of mastectomy skin flap viability is vital as necrosis causes significant morbidity, potentially compromising results and delaying oncological management. Traditionally assessed by clinical judgement, a more objective evaluation can be provided using intraoperative imaging modalities. This systematic review aimed to compare all intraoperative techniques for assessment of mastectomy flap viability.MethodsA systematic literature review was performed using MEDLINE and Embase databases. Primary outcomes reported included specificity, sensitivity and predictive values of each test, and mean rates of mastectomy flap necrosis and reoperation. Secondary outcomes included cost analysis.ResultsSome 18 studies were included. Designs were prospective cohort study (8), retrospective case series (4), prospective case series (3), retrospective case–control study (1), prospective pilot trial (1) and cost analysis study (1). The studies compared indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) (16 studies) and fluorescein dye angiography (FA) (3 studies) with clinical judgement. Sensitivity and specificity were highest for ICGA (5 studies) ranging from 38 to 100 and 68 to 91 per cent respectively. Both methods overpredicted necrosis. Mean rates of flap necrosis and reoperation decreased with ICGA (7·9 and 5·5 per cent respectively) and FA (3 and 0 per cent) compared with clinical judgement (19·4 and 12·9 per cent). Two studies were designed to define numerical parameters corresponding to perfusion using intraoperative techniques. Two studies performed a cost analysis for ICGA; one claimed a cost benefit and the other advocated its use in high‐risk patients only.ConclusionICGA and FA are potentially useful tools for mastectomy flap assessment. However, the predictive accuracy is subject to the specific settings and model of equipment used. Current recommendations support their use in high‐risk patients.
“…1). After detailed examination of 30 full‐text articles, 18 studies7
19, 20
28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, including 2077 patients, were included in this review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One was to compare rates of mastectomy necrosis and other complications, such as reoperation rates, and clinical outcomes between the techniques used ( Table
1). Seven case series7
28, 29, 30, 31, 32
34 and one cohort study33 used this approach. The alternative approach in seven prospective cohort studies19
20, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 was to evaluate flap perfusion using the intraoperative modalities and to record the predicted areas of necrosis using photographic documentation or video recording.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mastectomy flap necrosis rates were compared with clinical judgement in seven7
28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 studies using ICGA, one study using FA33 and one pilot study using ODIS34. Use of ICGA in 652 and FA in 34 breasts resulted in a decrease in mean mastectomy flap necrosis compared with clinical judgement in 1964 breasts (7·9 and 3 compared with 19·4 per cent) ( Table
3).…”
BackgroundAccurate prediction of mastectomy skin flap viability is vital as necrosis causes significant morbidity, potentially compromising results and delaying oncological management. Traditionally assessed by clinical judgement, a more objective evaluation can be provided using intraoperative imaging modalities. This systematic review aimed to compare all intraoperative techniques for assessment of mastectomy flap viability.MethodsA systematic literature review was performed using MEDLINE and Embase databases. Primary outcomes reported included specificity, sensitivity and predictive values of each test, and mean rates of mastectomy flap necrosis and reoperation. Secondary outcomes included cost analysis.ResultsSome 18 studies were included. Designs were prospective cohort study (8), retrospective case series (4), prospective case series (3), retrospective case–control study (1), prospective pilot trial (1) and cost analysis study (1). The studies compared indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) (16 studies) and fluorescein dye angiography (FA) (3 studies) with clinical judgement. Sensitivity and specificity were highest for ICGA (5 studies) ranging from 38 to 100 and 68 to 91 per cent respectively. Both methods overpredicted necrosis. Mean rates of flap necrosis and reoperation decreased with ICGA (7·9 and 5·5 per cent respectively) and FA (3 and 0 per cent) compared with clinical judgement (19·4 and 12·9 per cent). Two studies were designed to define numerical parameters corresponding to perfusion using intraoperative techniques. Two studies performed a cost analysis for ICGA; one claimed a cost benefit and the other advocated its use in high‐risk patients only.ConclusionICGA and FA are potentially useful tools for mastectomy flap assessment. However, the predictive accuracy is subject to the specific settings and model of equipment used. Current recommendations support their use in high‐risk patients.
“…56,86,98,99 Both SPY ® and SPY Elite ® generate quantitative perfusion values based on fluorescence intensity detected in the tissue. [99][100][101] This system has been investigated for multiple intraoperative uses during breast reconstruction, including perfusion assessment of mastectomy skin flaps, Open Access Surgery 2014:7 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Dovepress 6 Ferzoco pedicle flaps, and free-tissue transfers, 56,98,99,[101][102][103] and in head and neck 104 and abdominal wall reconstruction surgeries. 100 The clinical utility of the SPY ® system in breast surgery has been described by Newman and Samson, 102 who reported that perfusion problems identified with SPY ® in four of eight patients undergoing free-flap breast reconstruction led to interventions that prevented flap necrosis in three patients.…”
Abdominal wall reconstructions, and complex ventral hernia repairs in particular, pose significant challenges to surgeons and are associated with serious postoperative wound healing complications often related to poor tissue perfusion. Maintenance of adequate perfusion of central adipocutaneous tissue is critical for minimizing risk of wound-related complications following herniorrhaphy; however, accurate tissue perfusion assessment can be challenging in this setting. Technologies such as thermography and laser Doppler flowmetry are not widely used in clinical settings to assess tissue perfusion, and most surgeons currently rely upon subjective assessments of tissue viability to guide intraoperative decisions regarding reconstruction. New technological developments, including spectroscopic imaging and indocyanine green-based near-infrared laser fluorescence, permit quantitative, real-time, intraoperative visualization of tissue perfusion and have demonstrated sensitivity and accuracy in a variety of reconstructive settings. Evidence suggests these technologies can be used to optimize perfusion at the time of operation and prevent perfusion-related complications such as flap necrosis. Future studies and physician reports describing these perfusion assessment technologies in complex ventral hernia repair will supply important information regarding their utility in patients undergoing this procedure.
“…If the implant is accepted easily and without tension, a temporary suture is placed, and vascular skin flap perfusion is assessed with intravenous injection of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography using the SPY Elite protocol (Novadaq Technologies, Inc, Mississauga, ON), as previously reported by several authors. [27][28][29][30] If vascular perfusion is deemed adequate using accepted criteria, 28,29 the lateral pectoralis major muscle is reflected and a subpectoral cautery dissection performed with the inferior and inferomedial attachments of the pectoralis major (PM) to the ribs and sternum is released. It is critical to elevate the PM sufficiently in a cephalad direction to allow for adequate mobilization and proper redraping and insetting of the pectoralis/ADM composite with undue tension once constructed.…”
Direct to implant reconstruction can be technically more demanding and exacting than 2-stage expander/implant reconstructions. A review of this single surgeon series confirms that despite a learning curve with a higher complication rate early in the series, in the setting of proper patient selection DTI immediate reconstruction is both safe and reliable, and can potentially have clinical, psychological, and aesthetic advantages for patients when compared with a 2-stage expander/implant reconstruction, with 40% of patients having 1 operation only. The use of a patented 2-D template has reduced complications and the rate of reoperation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.