2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential of Carpooling among Unfamiliar Users: Case of Undergraduate Students at Istanbul Technical University

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is opposite with prior research, which found that men are less likely than women to use carpooling services [39]. A study conducted in Turkey shows that women and regular campus travelers are more likely to use carpooling [40]. The occupation variable is a positive significant factor for carpooling in Karachi, which indicates that employed people were more likely to use carpooling for their travel purposes.…”
Section: Estimated Model Coefficientscontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…This finding is opposite with prior research, which found that men are less likely than women to use carpooling services [39]. A study conducted in Turkey shows that women and regular campus travelers are more likely to use carpooling [40]. The occupation variable is a positive significant factor for carpooling in Karachi, which indicates that employed people were more likely to use carpooling for their travel purposes.…”
Section: Estimated Model Coefficientscontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…reduction Acceptable price reduction to the UberPool use: 0 -one would not use the service under any circumstance; 1 -up to 30%; 2 -from 31% to 70%; 3 -from 71% to 100% group Acceptable number of passengers to share a trip with: from 0 to 7 (assuming 9 people including the driver as the higher capacity of an automobile)** cost Cost importance over the UberPool choice: from 1 (very relevant) to 5 (very irrelevant) time Travel time importance over the UberPool choice: from 1 (very relevant) to 5 (very irrelevant) unknown Share a trip with unknown passengers importance over the UberPool choice: from 1 (very relevant) to 5 (very irrelevant) environment Environment importance over the UberPool choice: from 1 (very relevant) to 5 (very irrelevant) safety Safety importance over the UberPool choice: from 1 (very relevant) to 5 (very irrelevant) * The minimum wage in Brazil is equivalent to US$ 286.54rate of R$ 3.27 in June 9 th 2017 (BCB, 2017). ** Brazilian Traffic Code (Brazil, 2008a) The criteria were chosen according to the literature review on factors that influences on ridesplitting and on carpooling decision, due to the similarity between both travel modes and the lack of research that specifically address ridesplitting (Chen et al, 2017;Cools, Tormans, Briers, & Teller, 2013;Correia & Viegas, 2011;Delhomme & Gheorghiu, 2016;Li et al, 2008;Neoh, Chipulu, & Marshall, 2015;Tezcan, 2016;Waerden, Lem, & Schaefer, 2015).…”
Section: Variable Code Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A questão da divisão de custo não faz parte do modelo inal. Sendo assim, os respondentes se mostram dispostos a usar carona independente da renda, como igualmente concluıdo por Tezcan (2016). Desse modo, seria mais atrativo propor uma remuneração através de bônus/descontos para utilização de serviços de empresas patrocinadoras do sistema, do que a divisão de custo propriamente dita.…”
Section: Resultados E Análisesunclassified
“…(Delhomme e Gheorghiu, 2016;Buliung et al 2009;Li et al, 2008). Apesar dos estudos citados focarem a população em geral, esses resultados se repetem quando a análise é restrita a populações universitárias (Tahmasseby, Kattan e Barbour, 2016;Tezcan, 2016). Contudo, o maior uso pelo sexo feminino não pode ser considerado um fato incontroverso, uma vez que outros estudos apontam resultados divergentes (Correia e Viegas, 2011;Ciari e Axhausen, 2011).…”
Section: Revisão Da Literatura: Carona E Comportamentounclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation