2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential distribution of emerald ash borer: What can we learn from ecological niche models using Maxent and GARP?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assumed that this area reflects the geographic region that has been accessible to the species over relevant time periods (M in the BAM framework; Peterson et al., ). We randomly chose 20% of the 453 unique occurrences of collared peccary and left them aside for model evaluations. Thus, we used the remaining 363 occurrences and the environmental values (see the section environmental variables) correspondent to the extent of the study area for model development. We modelled the ecological niche of the collared peccary using GARP (Genetic Algorithm for Rule‐set Production; e.g., Kumara & Suganthasakthivel, ; Sobek‐Swant, Kluza, Cuddington, & Lyons, ; Peterson, Radocy, Hall, Peterhans, & Celesia, ; Gentry, Sturm, & Peterson, ), a machine learning algorithm that works in an artificial intelligence framework. GARP detects non‐random relationships between species’ occurrences and pseudo‐absences in relation to environmental variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assumed that this area reflects the geographic region that has been accessible to the species over relevant time periods (M in the BAM framework; Peterson et al., ). We randomly chose 20% of the 453 unique occurrences of collared peccary and left them aside for model evaluations. Thus, we used the remaining 363 occurrences and the environmental values (see the section environmental variables) correspondent to the extent of the study area for model development. We modelled the ecological niche of the collared peccary using GARP (Genetic Algorithm for Rule‐set Production; e.g., Kumara & Suganthasakthivel, ; Sobek‐Swant, Kluza, Cuddington, & Lyons, ; Peterson, Radocy, Hall, Peterhans, & Celesia, ; Gentry, Sturm, & Peterson, ), a machine learning algorithm that works in an artificial intelligence framework. GARP detects non‐random relationships between species’ occurrences and pseudo‐absences in relation to environmental variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Sobek‐Swant et al. ), and estimating response to global climate change (Guisan and Thuiller ). An implicit assumption of SDMs is that in sites predicted to be highly suitable, species would have higher fitness compared to sites predicted to be poorly suitable (Guisan and Thuiller ); however, this relationship is rarely tested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Qin et al () concluded the opposite; for large sample sizes ( n > 150) like ours, which used 634 GARP training points, Terribile and Diniz‐Filho () reported that Maxent and GARP were similar in their predicted areas. One of the commonly stated weaknesses of GARP is its potential to overestimate the geographic range and generate false positives (Elith and Graham , Sobek‐Swant et al ). If these over predictions did occur, then our extent:summer range ratio is a more conservative estimate of the area affected, which we would argue is preferred for species protection initiatives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%