2015
DOI: 10.1071/fp14097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential advantages of highly mycotrophic foraging for the establishment of early successional pioneer plants on sand

Abstract: Adaptive traits ensuring efficient nutrient acquisition, such as extensive fine root systems, are crucial for establishment of pioneer plants on bare sand. Some successful pioneer species of temperate, European sand ecosystems are characterised as obligate mycorrhizals, thus likely substituting fine roots with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). However, it is not clear whether AM fungal-mediated acquisition of scarce and immobile nutrients such as phosphorus (P) is an advantageous strategy on bare sand over f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be explained by the fact that over three times more polar metabolic features are modulated in pool size in leaves of P. lanceolata than in P. annua plants under AM conditions (Schweiger et al ., ), which should also be mirrored, at least in part, in the phloem sap. The difference in responses in systemic leaf tissues to the same AMF species between the two plant species may be attributable to a higher fungal root colonisation of dicots compared with grasses (Reinhart et al ., ; Schweiger et al ., ; Höpfner et al ., ), which was also found in our study (Fig. c).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This might be explained by the fact that over three times more polar metabolic features are modulated in pool size in leaves of P. lanceolata than in P. annua plants under AM conditions (Schweiger et al ., ), which should also be mirrored, at least in part, in the phloem sap. The difference in responses in systemic leaf tissues to the same AMF species between the two plant species may be attributable to a higher fungal root colonisation of dicots compared with grasses (Reinhart et al ., ; Schweiger et al ., ; Höpfner et al ., ), which was also found in our study (Fig. c).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is well‐known that plant species, cultivars, and accessions respond differently to AMF. Many forbs show a high growth dependency on AM, while the growth response of grasses to AM varies from positive over neutral to negative effects (Hetrick, Wilson, & Cox, 1993; Höpfner, Friede, Unger, & Beyschlag, 2015; Plenchette, Fortin, & Furlan, 1983; Watts‐Williams et al., 2019). Our results indicate that the responsiveness may also differ between plant organs, leading to distinct investments of resources into different plant parts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As opposed to our second hypothesis that the AMF has no influence on the growth of C. canescens , this species showed a markedly negative MGD throughout all treatments, thus indicating consistent AMF parasitism in this species. In a previous pot study, mycorrhizal responsiveness of C. canescens to R. irregularis has been described as neutral (Höpfner et al, 2014 ) and C. canescens is generally considered facultatively mycotrophic (Wang and Qiu, 2006 ; Hempel et al, 2013 ) with quite variable colonization. Negative MGDs in C. canescens in this study may be explained by the fact that, in contrast to pot experiments (e.g., Höpfner et al, 2014 ), there was no spatial limitation for root growth in our experimental setup, leading to better nutrient availability for NM plants and thus reduced mycorrhizal benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous pot study, mycorrhizal responsiveness of C. canescens to R. irregularis has been described as neutral (Höpfner et al, 2014 ) and C. canescens is generally considered facultatively mycotrophic (Wang and Qiu, 2006 ; Hempel et al, 2013 ) with quite variable colonization. Negative MGDs in C. canescens in this study may be explained by the fact that, in contrast to pot experiments (e.g., Höpfner et al, 2014 ), there was no spatial limitation for root growth in our experimental setup, leading to better nutrient availability for NM plants and thus reduced mycorrhizal benefits. However, the negative MGDs observed were not clearly related to conditions promoting mycorrhizal parasitism, as although shade and P fertilization had strong negative effects on the growth of AM C. canescens , similar effects were found for NM C. canescens .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation