2017
DOI: 10.1111/een.12461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant species, mycorrhiza, and aphid age influence the performance and behaviour of a generalist

Abstract: 1. Life‐history traits of herbivores are shaped by the combination of various extrinsic and intrinsic variables. However, studies investigating the impact of both variables on insect behavioural phenotypes are rare, and research including the modulation of host plant quality by arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) (extrinsic variable) and the herbivore developmental stage (intrinsic variable) on aphid behaviour is lacking. 2. To study the influences of extrinsic and intrinsic variables on aphid performance and behaviour… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences could be driven by the variable rates at which AM fungi colonise plant roots (Hart & Reader, 2002), as the stage of AM colonisation can determine how mycorrhizal fungi impact aphid development (Tomczak & Müller, 2017), perhaps due to the triggering of different phytohormonal pathways at different phases of root infection (Cameron et al, 2013). In studying the effect of mycorrhizal colonisation on aphid numbers alone, it is conceivable that fungal‐mediated effects on other aspects of aphid performance were missed, such as relative growth rate (Tomczak & Müller, 2017, 2018), survivorship (Volpe et al, 2018) and feeding behaviour (Simon et al, 2017). Over longer time periods—such as a full growing season—or in non‐crop systems, these subtle changes may ultimately impact pest numbers and thus herbivore pressure, meaning these traits should be considered in subsequent research into this economically important yet poorly studied tri‐partite system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences could be driven by the variable rates at which AM fungi colonise plant roots (Hart & Reader, 2002), as the stage of AM colonisation can determine how mycorrhizal fungi impact aphid development (Tomczak & Müller, 2017), perhaps due to the triggering of different phytohormonal pathways at different phases of root infection (Cameron et al, 2013). In studying the effect of mycorrhizal colonisation on aphid numbers alone, it is conceivable that fungal‐mediated effects on other aspects of aphid performance were missed, such as relative growth rate (Tomczak & Müller, 2017, 2018), survivorship (Volpe et al, 2018) and feeding behaviour (Simon et al, 2017). Over longer time periods—such as a full growing season—or in non‐crop systems, these subtle changes may ultimately impact pest numbers and thus herbivore pressure, meaning these traits should be considered in subsequent research into this economically important yet poorly studied tri‐partite system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, a few aphid behavioral traits (activity, exploration, and boldness) were examined on two plant species that were either noncolonized or colonized by AM fungi (Tomczak et al, 2016). It was shown recently that extrinsic (host plant quality modulated by AM symbiosis) and intrinsic (aphid age) variables can impact aphid performance and behavior (activity and exploration) differently (Tomczak & Müller, 2018). Aphids are known to ingest all compounds present in sieve elements such as carbohydrates, amino acids, proteins, water, and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%