2006
DOI: 10.1038/ja.2006.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potency of Carbapenems for the Prevention of Carbapenem-Resistant Mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Abstract: The potencies of the carbapenems; doripenem (DRPM), meropenem (MEPM) and imipenem (IPM) in preventing the emergence of carbapenem-resistant mutants were examined in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. The carbapenems predominantly selected carbapenem-resistant mutants or carbapenem mutants with reduced susceptibilities that were specifically resistant to carbapenems and had arisen as a result of the reduced level of expression of the outer membrane protein with a molecular weight of about 48,000 (OprD). The potenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
51
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Only one isolate was resistant to carbapenems and didn't show crossresistance to other beta lactams so it can be imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa mutant. 24 We investigated the relation between mexA, mexC, mexX, mexE genes and quinolones because they are substrates of four efflux system but we didn't find. We also found no relation between mexR gene that negatively regulates mexAB-oprM, and mexT gene that positively regulates mexCD-oprJ and the resistance against the antibiotics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one isolate was resistant to carbapenems and didn't show crossresistance to other beta lactams so it can be imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa mutant. 24 We investigated the relation between mexA, mexC, mexX, mexE genes and quinolones because they are substrates of four efflux system but we didn't find. We also found no relation between mexR gene that negatively regulates mexAB-oprM, and mexT gene that positively regulates mexCD-oprJ and the resistance against the antibiotics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Doripenem represents an attractive option among the carbapenems since (I) it has potent in vitro activity against many Gram-negative and -positive pathogens; 1,4,19,20 (II) lower propensity to select for resistance; [21][22][23] (III) safe tolerability profile with lower seizure potential than imipenem; 4,8,24 and (IV) extended solution stability at room temperature. 4,8,25 Sakyo et al 21 have shown that the potency of carbapenems in preventing the growth of the carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa mutants differed for doripenem, imipenem, and meropenem. Mutants were not selected on agar plates containing ½ or ¼ MIC doripenem at a frequency of greater than 10 -9 per cell per generation, whereas mutants of each P. aeruginosa strain were selected on agar containing meropenem or imipenem at frequencies of 10 -7 to 10 -9 per cell per generation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo, the proliferative inhibitory effect and maximal bactericidal action correlate with the time for which the drug concentration exceeds its minimum inhibitory concentration MIC ; T MIC . In the present study, we chose DRPM as the antibiotic to be evaluated for the following reasons : 1 DRPM is highly effective against aerobic Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, as well as anaerobic bacteria, and it suppresses the growth of antimicrobial-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa ; 2 DRPM, MEPM, and IPM exhibit potent activity, with an MIC 90 of 4, 16, and 32 µg / ml, respectively, and DRPM is clinically effective against P. aeruginosa infection ; 3 DRPM does not show any cross-resistance with MEPM and IPM against P. aeruginosa ; 4 incompatibility between DRPM and protease inhibitors is low ; and 5 DRPM is a drug with little effect on the central nervous system [30][31][32][33][34][35][36] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%