In patients with SAP, administration of a large fluid volume within the first 24 hours is associated with decreased mortality.

No abstract

PS has insufficient patency for preoperative biliary drainage. Given the drawbacks of external drainage via NBC, an alternative method of internal drainage should be explored.

Background and study aims  This study investigated the feasibility of side-by-side (SBS) partially covered self-expandable metal stent (PCSEMS) placement for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO). Patients and methods  We retrospectively analyzed 33 patients from a single center who underwent endoscopic biliary drainage for unresectable MHBO from July 2013 to June 2015. In all patients with bilateral obstruction during complete bilateral intrahepatic cholangiograms, we performed endoscopic SBS placement of a 6-mm diameter PCSEMS using an 8-French delivery system. All patients underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy. Generally, patients with recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) after stent placement underwent endoscopic reintervention. Our study outcomes included the technical and functional success rates, RBO rate, time to RBO (TRBO), reintervention rate, and incidence of adverse events. Results  Seventeen patients with unresectable MHBO during complete bilateral intrahepatic cholangiograms underwent endoscopic SBS PCSEMS placement (median age, 78 years; men, 9). Lesions were Bismuth types II (n = 10), III (n = 1), and IV (n = 6), including 10 cholangiocarcinomas, 3 gallbladder cancers, and 4 metastatic cancers. In all patients, the PCSEMS was placed across the duodenal papilla. The technical and functional success rates were 100 % and 82 %, respectively. The median procedure time was 43 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]: 36 – 52 minutes). Twelve patients had RBO (71 %), including 9 stent occlusions due to sludge and 3 stent migrations. The median TRBO was 79 days (IQR: 58 – 156 days) during the follow-up period (median 192 days [IQR: 88 – 551 days]). The median TRBO of patients with Bismuth type II lesions was significantly longer than that of patients with Bismuth types III and IV lesions (87 days [IQR: 70 – 244 days] vs. 54 days [IQR: 35 – 100 days]; P  = 0.030). Thirteen patients (76 %) required endoscopic reintervention. Endoscopic stent removal was possible in 6 patients without tumor ingrowth into the uncovered distal part of the stent. One late adverse event (≥ 31 days) occurred (cholangitis). Conclusions  Endoscopic SBS placement of a PCSEMS was feasible in patients with unresectable MHBO. Additionally, reinterventional stent removal was possible in the absence of tumor ingrowth.

Background Continuous regional arterial infusion (CRAI) of protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate (NM) is used in the context of predicted severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) to prevent the development of pancreatic necrosis. Although this therapy is well known in Japan, its efficacy and safety remain unclear. Methods This investigator-initiated and-driven, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial (UMIN000020868) enrolled 39 patients with predicted SAP and low enhancement of the pancreatic parenchyma on computed tomography (CT). Twenty patients were assigned to the CRAI group, while 19 served as controls and were administered NM at the same dose intravenously (IV group). The primary endpoint was the development of pancreatic necrosis as determined by CT on Day 14, judged by blinded central review. Results There was no difference between the CRAI and IV groups regarding the percentages of participants who Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (

The prognostic factor score has an equivalent ability for predicting mortality compared with the APACHE II score. Regarding the ability for predicting the development of severe complications during the clinical course of AP, the prognostic factor score may be superior to the APACHE II score.

Our retrospective analysis did not demonstrate the advantage of ENBD over EBS as the initial PBD for resectable hilar MBO. Although the technical success rate of endoscopic PBD was high, its re-intervention rate was not negligible, and unplanned re-intervention was associated with a poor prognosis in resected hilar MBO.

Objective Antimicrobial prophylaxis is not generally recommended for patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) owing to the limited clinical benefits. Nonetheless, it is frequently administered in actual practice given the patients' critical condition and the lack of solid evidence showing adverse effects of antimicrobial prophylaxis. We evaluated herein an association between antimicrobial prophylaxis and invasive pancreatic candidiasis as an adverse effect in patients with SAP. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients with SAP who were admitted to the study institutions (n = 44) between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2013. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusting for the extent of pancreatic necrosis and surgical interventions for invasive pancreatic candidiasis. Results Of the 1097 patients with SAP, 850 (77.5%) received antimicrobial prophylaxis, and 21 (1.9%) had invasive pancreatic candidiasis. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, antimicrobial prophylaxis was significantly associated with the development of invasive pancreatic candidiasis (adjusted odds ratio, 4.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–27.6) (P = 0.029). Conclusions The results suggest that antimicrobial prophylaxis may contribute to the development of invasive pancreatic candidiasis, and therefore, the routine use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for SAP may be discouraged.