2011
DOI: 10.3133/ofr20111308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postwildfire preliminary debris flow hazard assessment for the area burned by the 2011 Las Conchas Fire in north-central New Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In June and July of 2011, the Las Conchas fire burned 63 400 ha in the Jemez Mountains. At the time, it was the largest fire in New Mexico state history, and burned over areas previously burned by the Dome fire of 1996 and the Cerro Grande fire of 2000 (Tillery et al 2011). Over 90% of the Frijoles Canyon watershed was burned, and the middle of the watershed was especially damaged with high-severity burns.…”
Section: Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In June and July of 2011, the Las Conchas fire burned 63 400 ha in the Jemez Mountains. At the time, it was the largest fire in New Mexico state history, and burned over areas previously burned by the Dome fire of 1996 and the Cerro Grande fire of 2000 (Tillery et al 2011). Over 90% of the Frijoles Canyon watershed was burned, and the middle of the watershed was especially damaged with high-severity burns.…”
Section: Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dendrochronology studies in VCNP have documented a shift in the fire regime from frequent, low-severity wildfires before 1900 to larger, high-severity fires post-1900 (Dewar, 2011). The recurrence interval of wildfires in the pre-1900 era was in the range of two to 25 years based on fire-scar records (Touchan et al, 1996;Dewar, 2011). Large, standreplacing, high-severity fires have become more common in the modern (post-1900) era with recurrence intervals estimated to be on the order of hundreds of years (Touchan et al, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thresholds in gravel fraction for 0–1 cm depth and for silt + clay at 0–1 cm both correspond to transitions into high burn severity for the MTBS and BARC 4 thematic burn severity (Figure a,d; Table ). Prior work has documented elevated magnitudes of post wildfire overland flow generation and geomorphic response in the area affected by the 2011 Las Conchas Fire (Dahm et al, ; ICMN, ; NPS, ; Orem & Pelletier, ; Pelletier & Orem, ; Reale et al, ; Sherson et al, ; Tillery et al, ). Hydraulic erosion associated with the elevated surface runoff generation preferentially erodes finer silt and clay size particles, leaving an armoured surface lag with coarser materials including gravel and stone fragments (Canfield, Lopes, & Goodrich, ; Nearing, Simanton, Norton, Bulygin, & Stone, ; Poesen, van Wesemael, Bunte, & Benet, ; Simanton, Renard, Christiansen, & Lane, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Las Conchas wildfire also increased sediment yields (Orem & Pelletier, , ; Pelletier & Orem, ). Debris flow assessments suggested that the area would be problematic for water‐related hazards for years following the wildfire (Tillery, Darr, Cannon, & Michael, ).…”
Section: Field Area and Burn Severity Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%