2011
DOI: 10.3133/ofr20111257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postwildfire debris flows hazard assessment for the area burned by the 2011 Track Fire, northeastern New Mexico and southeastern Colorado

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This re had devastating impacts on downstream communities such as signicant erosion of the burn scar, and the closure of drinking water treatment facilities for the cities of Albuquerque and Santa Fe due to the high turbidity of the water following storm events that created large debris ows. 12 Extensive quantities of ash produced from the Las Conchas wildre owed through smaller tributaries and into important drinking water sources. 13 Signicant sags in the dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations and pH level decreases were observed throughout the Rio Grande continuum, while turbidity spikes increased to levels above 1000 NTU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This re had devastating impacts on downstream communities such as signicant erosion of the burn scar, and the closure of drinking water treatment facilities for the cities of Albuquerque and Santa Fe due to the high turbidity of the water following storm events that created large debris ows. 12 Extensive quantities of ash produced from the Las Conchas wildre owed through smaller tributaries and into important drinking water sources. 13 Signicant sags in the dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations and pH level decreases were observed throughout the Rio Grande continuum, while turbidity spikes increased to levels above 1000 NTU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cannon et al (2010b) and Gartner et al (2008) indicate that their V model is valid to within an order of magnitude of the predicted debris-flow V. These methods are most commonly used to evaluate hazards to within an order of magnitude by calculating P and V for a specific rainfall scenario, generalizing expected Vs and Ps into relative hazard classes, and identifying the relative hazard along a portion of a mountain front through combined P and V classes. Examples of this process can be seen in Cannon et al (2010a) and Tillery et al (2011). One reason for this generalized approach is the uncertainty inherent in the models, especially modeled Vs.…”
Section: Model Uncertainty and Alternative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cannon et al, 2010a, Tillery et al, 2011 are commonly performed after a fire to help guide natural hazards management. The scope of these hazard assessments is often limited to estimating probability and volume of potential debris-flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extracted archaeological fire effects and site severity data from assessment forms filled out by archaeologists during post-fire reconnaissance of archaeological sites. These assessments, conducted immediately after wildfires, provide fieldmeasured information on site condition, burn severity, fire effects to features and artifacts, potential erosion issues, and other fire effects information, and are conducted to determine need for follow-up action to reduce potential negative after-effects of fire (e.g., hazards associated with standing dead trees, flooding, or erosion) (Clark and McKinley 2011;Tillery et al 2011). All known (i.e., previously recorded) sites within four of the five fires were assessed.…”
Section: Archaeological Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%