1981
DOI: 10.3171/jns.1981.54.6.0814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posttraumatic bilateral vertebral artery occlusion

Abstract: ✓ A case of bilateral vertebral artery occlusion following trauma in a 25-year-old woman is presented. The patient had minimal subluxation of C-2 on C-3 without neurological deficit. Her neck was immobilized for 16 days, and then a posterior fixation of C-1 through C-4 was performed with Kirschner wires and methyl methacrylate. Occlusion of the vertebral arteries has persisted, but collateral vessels are adequate and the patient has remained neurologically normal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, 12,22,24,27,33,35,38,39) Unlike unilateral VA occlusion most in which only 20% of patients were symptomatic,") most patients with bilateral VA occlusion are symptomatic. Only one patient did not have any symptoms related to the bilateral VA occlusion,") possibly due to adequate collateral supply from the posterior communicating arteries .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, 12,22,24,27,33,35,38,39) Unlike unilateral VA occlusion most in which only 20% of patients were symptomatic,") most patients with bilateral VA occlusion are symptomatic. Only one patient did not have any symptoms related to the bilateral VA occlusion,") possibly due to adequate collateral supply from the posterior communicating arteries .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 5,21 The most initial injury mechanism of the artery is from either excessive stretching of vessel between two adjacent foramen transversarium, or direct lesion to the vessel wall. The mechanism of VAI was once thought to be hyperextension injury, 31,32 but recently distractive flexion was identified as a likelier cause. 4,13,17,26,34,35 Veras et al 11 / 16 reported 6 VAI patients injured in motor vehicle accidents; in all cases, the injury mechanism was flexion distraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors regard hyperextension of the head with or without rotation and lateral flexion, other authors distraction-flexion injury resulting in unilateral or bilateral facet joint dislocation as the main risk factor [24, 26, 27]. Other possible risk factors reported are lateral dislocation as well as transverse process fracture [28, 29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cervical spine injury may lead to stretching and tearing of the vertebral artery which is tethered to the bone at different locations in its intravertebral course. Most commonly, vertebral artery injury is described as occurring at C5/6 when the vessel enters the foramen transversum, at the atlanto-axial level after it leaves the foramen transversum and at the atlanto-occipital level [26]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%