2022
DOI: 10.1007/s42000-022-00362-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postoperative complications after endoscope-assisted transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas: a case series, systematic review, and meta-analysis of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most reports focus more on the characteristics of tumor growth and surgical techniques which include pituitary gland and stalk manipulation during the operation [14]. As previously mentioned, larger tumor size, higher grade, pituitary apoplexy, multiple surgeries, and invasion of the dura or cavernous sinus are all risk factors for new pituitary dysfunction [38][39][40]. Compared with a microscope, the use of an endoscope may preserve pituitary function better with a similar degree of resection [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most reports focus more on the characteristics of tumor growth and surgical techniques which include pituitary gland and stalk manipulation during the operation [14]. As previously mentioned, larger tumor size, higher grade, pituitary apoplexy, multiple surgeries, and invasion of the dura or cavernous sinus are all risk factors for new pituitary dysfunction [38][39][40]. Compared with a microscope, the use of an endoscope may preserve pituitary function better with a similar degree of resection [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After autopsy in people who are not diagnosed with pituitary adenoma, it has been found that more than 10% of people had pituitary adenomas (Bing, 2021). Although most of pituitary adenoma are benign tumours and can be removed, the patients still have some uncomfortable symptoms after operation, resulting in impaired quality of life (Graffeo et al, 2022; Rosinha et al, 2022; Stefanidis et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] Such complications, which can arise for a variety of risk factors not limited to the procedure that 9,10 result in returns to the operating room, prolonged hospital stays, and unplanned readmissions. 5,11,12 While the carcinogenic effects of tobacco smoke have been well-characterized, smoking tobacco has also been identified as a significant risk for poor healing and the need for reoperation after head and neck surgery. 13,14 One study of 165 endoscopic and open skull base surgeries has previously reported smoking to be a risk for 30-day readmission; however, this study excluded patients with pituitary adenomas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%