2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.08.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postharvest UV-C treatment of tomato fruits: Changes in simple sugars and organic acids contents during storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effect on TSS, TA and TSS/TA ratio SSC and TA were measured on fully ripe fruits and the result shows that SSC and TA were not affected by UV-C, 1-MCP treatments alone or the combination treatment of 1-MCP + UV-C (Table 2). These results are consistent with those previously reported by Liu et al, (2009) who observed that SSC did not change in tomatoes (cv Red Ruby) after treatment with 22.8 W.m -2 UV-C lights stored at 12 -14°C for 21 d. However, other reports have shown that tomatoes treated with 3.7 kJ.m −2 UV-C followed by storage at 15°C for 15 d produced lower sugar content and higher in TA that untreated fruits (Charles et al, 2016). These differences may be due to the assessment of sugar content, where in this experiment SSC and TA were measured, while the previous report measured the total simple sugar of glucose, fructose and sucrose, as well as total organic acid were measured.…”
Section: Effect On Firmnesssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Effect on TSS, TA and TSS/TA ratio SSC and TA were measured on fully ripe fruits and the result shows that SSC and TA were not affected by UV-C, 1-MCP treatments alone or the combination treatment of 1-MCP + UV-C (Table 2). These results are consistent with those previously reported by Liu et al, (2009) who observed that SSC did not change in tomatoes (cv Red Ruby) after treatment with 22.8 W.m -2 UV-C lights stored at 12 -14°C for 21 d. However, other reports have shown that tomatoes treated with 3.7 kJ.m −2 UV-C followed by storage at 15°C for 15 d produced lower sugar content and higher in TA that untreated fruits (Charles et al, 2016). These differences may be due to the assessment of sugar content, where in this experiment SSC and TA were measured, while the previous report measured the total simple sugar of glucose, fructose and sucrose, as well as total organic acid were measured.…”
Section: Effect On Firmnesssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…SSC, TA and SSC/TA ratio UV-C treatment has been reported to influence the SSC or TA in a range of horticultural produce. For example Charles et al (2016) reported that tomatoes treated with 3.7 kJ m -2 UV-C followed by storage at 15°C for 15 days resulted in lower sugar content and higher in acid titre than untreated fruits. The results from this study showed that in general SSC and TA were not affected by UV-C treatment alone or in combination with 1-MCP (Table 2).…”
Section: Respiration Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are consistent with those previously reported by Liu et al (2009) who observed that TSS did not change in tomatoes (cv 'Red Ruby') after treated with 22.8 W m -2 UV-C lights stored at 12-14°C for 21 days. However UV-C treatments have been reported to decrease the levels of TSS and increase TA levels in strawberry (Baka et al 1999) and tomatoes (Charles et al 2016), whilst Erdinc and Demir (2009) reported that kiwifruit treated with UV-C lights increased in TSS levels during storage. The difference responses of UV-C treatments of sugar level may be due to defense mechanism.…”
Section: Tss and Tamentioning
confidence: 99%