“…Although PA is a common behaviour and phenomenon, extant research indicates a relatively low level of archival literacy and awareness among the general public. Studies also show that most writers neglect digital archival concerns (Becker and Nogues, 2012), evidencing “benign neglect” (Marshall, 2008) due to a lack of knowledge and technological know-how (Zhao et al , 2019). Consequently, user privacy and archiving security constitute significant challenges.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the first major challenge that needs to be overcome is individuals' (justifiable) unwillingness to spend too much energy on curation—an unwillingness scholars have called ‘benign neglect' (Marshall, 2008). Meanwhile, user privacy and archive security are the biggest risks and challenges faced by postgraduates in managing their digital archives (Zhao et al , 2019). Numerous studies confirm that experienced home computer users are creating, receiving and finding an increasing number of digital belongings, and that they have already lost irreplaceable digital artefacts such as photos, creative efforts and records (Marshall et al , 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the archival community, personal archives are generally used to refer to these materials, specifically referring to documents created, acquired or received by an individual in the course of his or her affairs and preserved in their original order (if such order exists) (Pearce-Moses and Baty, 2005), and personal archiving (PA) is the behaviour of created, acquired, received and maintained of these archives. However, PA practice has been complicated by the advent of the digital age—the increasing application of electronic technology and the rise of the Internet resulting in the accumulation of more personal digital archives, both on and offline (Zhao et al , 2019). As a result, PA is no longer a matter of simply collecting, organising and maintaining materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars are trying to develop aids that meet the needs of PA (Van Kleek et al , 2012; Dumais et al , 2003; Anciaux et al , 2019; Ji et al , 2019). Meanwhile, researchers in the field of LIAS are more concerned with the significance and strategies of PA (Sinn and Syn, 2014; Zhao et al , 2019), seek to provide professional guidance for public PA (Cushing, 2016; Becker and Nogues, 2012) and through a community-based participatory archiving project to provide equipment support for personal digital archiving (PDA) or impart core knowledge and skills about PDA(Han, 2019). Indeed, several libraries—including the Library of Congress (2019), Columbia University Library (2019) and Cornell University Library (2019)—have established PA guides on their websites.…”
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to propose a theoretical framework to illustrate the archival knowledge applied by archivists in their personal archiving (PA) and the mechanism of the application of archival knowledge in their PA.Design/methodology/approachThe grounded theory methodology was adopted. For data collection, in-depth interviews were conducted with 21 archivists in China. Data analysis was performed using the open coding, axial coding and selective coding to organise the archival knowledge composition of PA and develops the awareness-knowledge-action (AKA) integration model of archival knowledge application in the field of PA, according to the principles of the grounded theory.FindingsThe archival knowledge involved in the field of PA comprises four principal categories: documentation, arrangement, preservation and appraisal. Three interactive factors involved in archivists' archival knowledge application in the field of PA behaviour: awareness, knowledge and action, which form a pattern of awareness leading, knowledge guidance and action innovation, and archivists' PA practice is flexible and innovative. The paper underscored that it is need to improve archival literacy among general public.Originality/valueThe study constructs a theoretical framework to identify the specialised archival knowledge and skills of PA which is able to provide solutions for non-specialist PA and develops an AKA model to explain the interaction relationships between awareness, knowledge and action in the field of PA.
“…Although PA is a common behaviour and phenomenon, extant research indicates a relatively low level of archival literacy and awareness among the general public. Studies also show that most writers neglect digital archival concerns (Becker and Nogues, 2012), evidencing “benign neglect” (Marshall, 2008) due to a lack of knowledge and technological know-how (Zhao et al , 2019). Consequently, user privacy and archiving security constitute significant challenges.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the first major challenge that needs to be overcome is individuals' (justifiable) unwillingness to spend too much energy on curation—an unwillingness scholars have called ‘benign neglect' (Marshall, 2008). Meanwhile, user privacy and archive security are the biggest risks and challenges faced by postgraduates in managing their digital archives (Zhao et al , 2019). Numerous studies confirm that experienced home computer users are creating, receiving and finding an increasing number of digital belongings, and that they have already lost irreplaceable digital artefacts such as photos, creative efforts and records (Marshall et al , 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the archival community, personal archives are generally used to refer to these materials, specifically referring to documents created, acquired or received by an individual in the course of his or her affairs and preserved in their original order (if such order exists) (Pearce-Moses and Baty, 2005), and personal archiving (PA) is the behaviour of created, acquired, received and maintained of these archives. However, PA practice has been complicated by the advent of the digital age—the increasing application of electronic technology and the rise of the Internet resulting in the accumulation of more personal digital archives, both on and offline (Zhao et al , 2019). As a result, PA is no longer a matter of simply collecting, organising and maintaining materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars are trying to develop aids that meet the needs of PA (Van Kleek et al , 2012; Dumais et al , 2003; Anciaux et al , 2019; Ji et al , 2019). Meanwhile, researchers in the field of LIAS are more concerned with the significance and strategies of PA (Sinn and Syn, 2014; Zhao et al , 2019), seek to provide professional guidance for public PA (Cushing, 2016; Becker and Nogues, 2012) and through a community-based participatory archiving project to provide equipment support for personal digital archiving (PDA) or impart core knowledge and skills about PDA(Han, 2019). Indeed, several libraries—including the Library of Congress (2019), Columbia University Library (2019) and Cornell University Library (2019)—have established PA guides on their websites.…”
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to propose a theoretical framework to illustrate the archival knowledge applied by archivists in their personal archiving (PA) and the mechanism of the application of archival knowledge in their PA.Design/methodology/approachThe grounded theory methodology was adopted. For data collection, in-depth interviews were conducted with 21 archivists in China. Data analysis was performed using the open coding, axial coding and selective coding to organise the archival knowledge composition of PA and develops the awareness-knowledge-action (AKA) integration model of archival knowledge application in the field of PA, according to the principles of the grounded theory.FindingsThe archival knowledge involved in the field of PA comprises four principal categories: documentation, arrangement, preservation and appraisal. Three interactive factors involved in archivists' archival knowledge application in the field of PA behaviour: awareness, knowledge and action, which form a pattern of awareness leading, knowledge guidance and action innovation, and archivists' PA practice is flexible and innovative. The paper underscored that it is need to improve archival literacy among general public.Originality/valueThe study constructs a theoretical framework to identify the specialised archival knowledge and skills of PA which is able to provide solutions for non-specialist PA and develops an AKA model to explain the interaction relationships between awareness, knowledge and action in the field of PA.
“…Bergman et al (2003Bergman et al ( , 2008 define the process of managing personal information as user-subjective. Because each person manages his or her own information based on subjective decisions, different people are likely to employ different practices (Bergman and Whittaker, 2016;Whittaker and Sidner, 1996;Zhao et al, 2019).…”
PurposeDifferences in personal information management (PIM) behavior are well established in the literature, but are defined from the narrow perspective of practical use (e.g. filing/piling, emailing). This paper aims to identify the types of PIM behavior that would help us understand how people manage personal information in the digital era.Design/methodology/approachThe authors relied on the theoretical framework, published in a recent article (Alon and Nachmias, 2020a), examining actual PIM behavior (e.g. actual practice), ideal behavior (e.g. perceptions of best practice) and the gaps between them. Our framework drew on data collected via a questionnaire on the use of 25 PIM practices (N = 465).FindingsThe findings indicated four types of PIM behavior that differed by activity level (actual PIM) and satisfaction level (ideal PIM and gaps): passive and satisfied, active and satisfied, fairly active and unsatisfied and active and fairly satisfied. This allows the classification of users according to their dominant tendency to use specific practices.Originality/valuePrevious studies focused mainly on specific PIM practices or contexts. Our research creates a classification of types, based on ideal as well as actual PIM behavior, and also examines a broader perspective.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.