Oxford Handbooks Online 2013
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199588251.013.0020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postcolonialism and Popular Cultures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Curran & Park were convinced this predisposition had to be broken since they observed how always rich Western societies were producing theory around media and society. In this sense, Featherstone (2013) includes a new argument in the discussion pointing how during the 1990s postcolonial studies did not give attention to popular culture "[a]nd more recent reassessments have generally maintained this inattention" (p. 2). Featherstone analyzes how even recent postcolonial studies do not extend their areas of debate to popular materials.…”
Section: The De-colonial Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curran & Park were convinced this predisposition had to be broken since they observed how always rich Western societies were producing theory around media and society. In this sense, Featherstone (2013) includes a new argument in the discussion pointing how during the 1990s postcolonial studies did not give attention to popular culture "[a]nd more recent reassessments have generally maintained this inattention" (p. 2). Featherstone analyzes how even recent postcolonial studies do not extend their areas of debate to popular materials.…”
Section: The De-colonial Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%