Post-traumatic stress disorder in DSM-5: Estimates of prevalence and criteria comparison versus DSM-IV-TR in a non-clinical sample of earthquake survivors

Carmassi, Claudia; Akiskal, H. S.; Yong, SS; Stratta, Paolo; Calderani, E.; Massimetti, Enrico; Akiskal, Kk; Rossi, Alessandro; Dell’Osso, Liliana

doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.07.020

Cited by 81 publications

(57 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In line with our hypothesis and consistent with previous findings (Carmassi et al, 2013; Elhai et al, 2009, 2012; Gentes et al, 2014; Kilpatrick et al, 2013; Miller et al, 2013; O’Donnell et al, 2014; Stein et al, 2014), no change in provisional PTSD prevalence was identified when the criteria shifted from DSM-IV to DSM-5. Although, DSM-IV and DSM-5 include a different number of qualifying symptoms, group these symptoms into specific clusters, and thus implicitly demand specific symptom characteristics to be present in a minimum number and specific combination, possibly leading to the identification of somewhat different patient populations in the present study, the agreement between both systems was satisfactory.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

“…The majority of publications comparing DSM-IV to DSM-5 report no differences (Carmassi et al, 2013; Elhai, Ford, Ruggiero, & Christopher Frueh, 2009; Elhai et al, 2012; Gentes et al, 2014; Kilpatrick et al, 2013; Miller et al, 2013; O’Donnell et al, 2014), with the exception of Forbes et al (2011) who found lower PTSD prevalence under DSM-5. Of those who reported consistency (Carmassi et al, 2013; Elhai et al, 2009; Gentes et al, 2014; Kilpatrick et al, 2013), all reported satisfying high agreement between both versions of the DSM. Comparing the proposed ICD-11 to DSM-IV criteria, Stammel, Abbing, Heeke, and Knaevelsrud (2015) reported reduced PTSD prevalence according to the proposed ICD-11 criteria.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Whereas Stein et al (2014) found no differences in PTSD prevalence at all, O’Donnell et al (2014) reported no differences between DSM-5 and DSM-IV, but lower PTSD prevalence under the proposed ICD-11 compared to DSM-IV, DSM-5, and ICD-10. Notably, although interpretation of prevalence differences between different diagnostic systems is limited when no consistency is reported, analyses of agreement between the diagnostic systems are provided only by some authors (Carmassi et al, 2013; Elhai et al, 2009; Gentes et al, 2014; Kilpatrick et al, 2013; Morina et al, 2014; Stammel et al, 2015). …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While this is without doubt the gold standard for clinical research, clinical practice often heavily relies on self-administered instruments, underlining the importance of investigating the consistency when self-rating instruments for PTSD are provided. Based on research findings, we expected that the PTSD prevalence would be the same using DSM-IV versus DSM-5 criteria (Carmassi et al, 2013; Elhai et al, 2012; Gentes et al, 2014; Kilpatrick et al, 2013; Miller et al, 2013; O’Donnell et al, 2014; Stein et al, 2014), but would be reduced under the ICD-11 proposal as compared to ICD-10 and DSM-5 (O’Donnell et al, 2014; Wisco et al, 2016). …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Comparison of DSM-5 and proposed ICD-11 criteria for PTSD with DSM-IV and ICD-10: changes in PTSD prevalence in military personnel

Kuester

Köhler²,

Ehring

et al. 2017

European Journal of Psychotraumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Recently, changes have been introduced to the diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). Objectives:This study investigated the effect of the diagnostic changes made from DSM-IV to DSM-5 and from ICD-10 to the proposed ICD-11. The concordance of provisional PTSD prevalence between the diagnostic criteria was examined in a convenience sample of 100 members of the German Armed Forces. Method: Based on questionnaire measurements, provisional PTSD prevalence was assessed according to DSM-IV, DSM-5, ICD-10, and proposed ICD-11 criteria. Consistency of the diagnostic status across the diagnostic systems was statistically evaluated. Results: Provisional PTSD prevalence was the same for DSM-IV and DSM-5 (both 56%) and comparable under DSM-5 versus ICD-11 proposal (48%). Agreement between DSM-IV and DSM-5, and between DSM-5 and the proposed ICD-11, was high (both p < .001). Provisional PTSD prevalence was significantly increased under ICD-11 proposal compared to ICD-10 (30%) which was mainly due to the deletion of the time criterion. Agreement between ICD-10 and the proposed ICD-11 was low (p = .014). Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence for a satisfactory concordance between provisional PTSD prevalence based on the diagnostic criteria for PTSD that are defined using DSM-IV, DSM-5, and proposed ICD-11. This supports the assumption of a set of PTSD core symptoms as suggested in the ICD-11 proposal, when at the same time a satisfactory concordance between ICD-11 proposal and DSM was given. The finding of increased provisional PTSD prevalence under ICD-11 proposal in contrast to ICD-10 can be of guidance for future epidemiological research on PTSD prevalence, especially concerning further investigations on the impact, appropriateness, and usefulness of the time criterion included in ICD-10 versus the consequences of its deletion as proposed for ICD-11.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Comparison of DSM-5 and proposed ICD-11 criteria for PTSD with DSM-IV and ICD-10: changes in PTSD prevalence in military personnel

Kuester

Köhler²,

Ehring

et al. 2017

European Journal of Psychotraumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Trauma-related studies suggest that posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is one of the common negative psychological outcomes following traumatic events (Breslau, Troost, Bohnert, & Luo, 2013; Carmassi et al, 2013). Particularly, the prevalence rate of PTSD among adolescents is higher than adults (Hafstad, Dyb, Jensen, Steinberg, & Pynoos, 2014; Wang, Long, Li, & Armour, 2011), as adolescence is a crucial juncture from both physical and psychological perspectives (Salmela-Aro, Savolainen, & Holopainen, 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Posttraumatic stress disorder symptom severity and control beliefs as the predictors of academic burnout amongst adolescents following the Wenchuan Earthquake

Zhou

2017

European Journal of Psychotraumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Previous studies indicate that posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and control beliefs can affect burnout and their unique role in this situation has been examined, but fewer studies have examined their combined role in adolescent’s academic burnout following traumatic events. Objective: This study examined the combined effect of PTSD symptom severity and control beliefs on academic burnout among adolescents, and assessed the moderating role of primary and secondary control beliefs in the relation between PTSD symptom severity and academic burnout. Methods: Seven hundred and forty-five adolescents were investigated using self-report questionnaires, and a series of regression equations examined the impact of PTSD severity and control beliefs on academic burnout. Results: PTSD symptom severity is associated positively with academic burnout, while primary and secondary control beliefs have a negative relation with academic burnout. In addition, primary control beliefs buffer the positive effects of PTSD symptom severity on academic burnout. We found that the positive relation between PTSD symptom severity and academic burnout in the low primary control beliefs group is more intense than that found in the high primary control beliefs group. Conclusions: PTSD symptom severity is a risk factor, whereas primary and secondary control beliefs are protective factors in academic burnout. In addition, PTSD symptom severity and primary control beliefs have a combined effect on academic burnout in adolescents following natural disasters.

show abstract

Unintended Consequences of Changing the Definition of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder inDSM-5

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Post-traumatic stress disorder in DSM-5: Estimates of prevalence and criteria comparison versus DSM-IV-TR in a non-clinical sample of earthquake survivors

Cited by 81 publications

References 32 publications

Comparison of DSM-5 and proposed ICD-11 criteria for PTSD with DSM-IV and ICD-10: changes in PTSD prevalence in military personnel

Comparison of DSM-5 and proposed ICD-11 criteria for PTSD with DSM-IV and ICD-10: changes in PTSD prevalence in military personnel

Posttraumatic stress disorder symptom severity and control beliefs as the predictors of academic burnout amongst adolescents following the Wenchuan Earthquake

Unintended Consequences of Changing the Definition of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder inDSM-5

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About