2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41587-022-01464-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-translational modifications reshape the antigenic landscape of the MHC I immunopeptidome in tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The workflows used for each dataset are as follows: HLA immunopeptidome [56] ( nonspecific-HLA-C57 workflow), melanoma DIA data [63] with MSFragger-DIA ( DIA_SpecLib_Quant) and with DIA-Umpire ( DIA_DIA-Umpire_SpecLib_Quant ), HeLa timsTOF [2] ( Default ), single cell proteomics with nanoPOTS [64] ( Default ), single cell proteomics with DISCO [46] ( Default ), and secretome [66] ( Default ). The HLA workflow was revised to add “--mods M:15.9949” to the Philosopher filter to perform group-specific FDR estimation [77] using the following three categories: unmodified peptides, peptides with oxidized M only, and peptides with any other modification. The nanoPOTS data were analyzed in separate experiments based on the number of cells (1, 3, 10, or 50).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The workflows used for each dataset are as follows: HLA immunopeptidome [56] ( nonspecific-HLA-C57 workflow), melanoma DIA data [63] with MSFragger-DIA ( DIA_SpecLib_Quant) and with DIA-Umpire ( DIA_DIA-Umpire_SpecLib_Quant ), HeLa timsTOF [2] ( Default ), single cell proteomics with nanoPOTS [64] ( Default ), single cell proteomics with DISCO [46] ( Default ), and secretome [66] ( Default ). The HLA workflow was revised to add “--mods M:15.9949” to the Philosopher filter to perform group-specific FDR estimation [77] using the following three categories: unmodified peptides, peptides with oxidized M only, and peptides with any other modification. The nanoPOTS data were analyzed in separate experiments based on the number of cells (1, 3, 10, or 50).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even highly distinctive peptides can be recognized by the same TCR with different conformations[64], indicating the limited efficacy of similarity searching in the discovery of cross-reactive peptides. In addition, a variety of post-translational modifications can reshape the peptides presented by MHC molecules and influence the T cell immune response[66], which further complicates TCR-pMHC recognition. To better understand and utilize T cell immune responses, the molecular basis underlying TCR-pMHC recognition remains to be comprehensively elucidated in the future, and further studies are necessary to unveil the association between cellular characteristics and TCR-pMHC interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even highly distinctive peptides can be recognized by the same TCR with different conformations [64], indicating the limited efficacy of similarity searching in the discovery of cross-reactive peptides. In addition, a variety of post-translational modifications can reshape the peptides presented by MHC molecules and influence the T cell immune response [66], which further complicates TCR-pMHC recognition. To…”
Section: Sars-cov-2 Epitope Nsp31790-1798 By Tcr-204mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-translational modifications increase the diversity of the immunopeptidome and may provide new targets for the immune system to recognize tumor cells or respond to pathogens. With PTM-driven antigenicity being continuously highlighted 9,31,43,44 , glycosylation is a key PTM that, despite its long history of research, remains understudied in the context of MHC presentation due to computational related challenges. In this work, we have developed a workflow for glyco-immunopeptidomics that combines the speed and sensitivity of MSFragger-Glyco, with the inclusion of glycopeptide-specific FDR control in Philosopher, which is critical for filtering out low-confidence identifications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%