2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.10.19.512904
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MSBooster: Improving Peptide Identification Rates using Deep Learning-Based Features

Abstract: Peptide identification in liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) experiments relies on computational algorithms for matching acquired MS/MS spectra against sequences of candidate peptides using database search tools, such as MSFragger. Here, we present a new tool, MSBooster, for rescoring peptide-to-spectrum matches using additional features incorporating deep learning-based predictions of peptide properties, such as LC retention time, ion mobility, and MS/MS spectra. We demonstrate the util… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(120 reference statements)
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MSFragger-DIA has been fully integrated into FragPipe, allowing one-stop DIA data analysis ( Figure 1c and Supplementary Figure 1 ). In FragPipe, the output of MSFragger-DIA and MSFragger can be processed by MSBooster [54] to leverage additional scores using deep-learning prediction. The output from MSBooster is fed to Percolator for additional rescoring and posterior error probability calculation, followed by ProteinProphet [34] for protein inference, Philosopher [55] for false discovery rate (FDR) filtering, and spectral library building with EasyPQP [48].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MSFragger-DIA has been fully integrated into FragPipe, allowing one-stop DIA data analysis ( Figure 1c and Supplementary Figure 1 ). In FragPipe, the output of MSFragger-DIA and MSFragger can be processed by MSBooster [54] to leverage additional scores using deep-learning prediction. The output from MSBooster is fed to Percolator for additional rescoring and posterior error probability calculation, followed by ProteinProphet [34] for protein inference, Philosopher [55] for false discovery rate (FDR) filtering, and spectral library building with EasyPQP [48].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using MSFragger-DIA, it is not necessary to predict the entire spectral library in advance, and there is no restriction on the size of peptides, peptide ion charge states, or modifications that can be considered. However, our workflows in FragPipe (for both DDA and DIA data) do benefit from deep learning-based predictions at the subsequent, rescoring stage with the help of MSBooster and Percolator [54]. Interestingly, we observed some advantages of using predicted spectra (instead of empirical ones) at the final targeted quantification extraction step.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we used Percolator (version 3.05.0) for PSM rescoring and q-values reported by Percolator were used. Note that FragPipe also has an option to calculate additional features for rescoring using the MS-Booster mode . However, because MS-Booster can only be used for standard searching, not for open searching, for consistency this functionality was not enabled.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes it possible to improve the spectrum identification results by accepting more target PSMs at a specific FDR threshold. Since the original description of Percolator, several approaches that extend upon this idea have been proposed, including tools that use different machine learning models instead of a linear SVM, integration with various search engines, and additional features that the classifier can use, often powered by deep learning. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that FragPipe also has an option to calculate additional features for rescoring using the MS-Booster mode. 18 However, because MS-Booster can only be used for standard searching, not for open searching, for consistency this functionality was not enabled.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%