Post‐project changes: occurrence, causes, and countermeasures

Abstract

Purpose -This purpose of this paper is to investigate the volume and background of changes done shortly after project completion. Design/methodology/approach -To ensure a consistent set of projects, selection criteria were related to project budget, time of completion, and executing institution. Data collection included an initial survey followed by interviews. Findings -The study identified frequency and extent of changes/alterations within a certain period after project completion as well as the dominating causes for such changes.Research limitations/implications -The study is based on a limited number of projects and from three specific Norwegian agencies. Future research should include a larger sample, possibly also covering other sectors. Practical implications -If acted upon, the suggestions for countermeasures can contribute to reducing or preventing post-project changes. The findings indicate a need for new performance measures for projects, as the classical parameters provide motivation to project managers and their teams to focus on project cost and timely delivery, rather than the life-cycle cost. Social implications -In sectors experiencing a widespread occurrence of changes after project completion, this could mean that cost overruns or functionality beyond what was sanctioned by the financing bodies are "hidden" in this type of change work. If so, this prevents sponsors and society from seeing the real project cost, and is clearly a misuse of resources. Originality/value -This paper contributes to the limited literature focusing on changes after project completion. The paper includes material that may help project managers and project owners avoid post-project changes and the costs and inconvenience associated with such changes.

AHP-Systems Thinking Analyses for Kaizen Costing Implementation in the Construction Industry

“…Ojelabi et al [63] also identify lack of construction business strategy as a barrier to client satisfaction. Client relationship management is enhanced where kaizen costing has been adopted [18,23,48]. The import of archetypes 6 and 7 in the construction process is successful project delivery and client satisfaction.…”

Savings measurement for capital equipment purchasing: challenges and conceptual model

“…Disregarding price changes after placing an order (PsC5) is another procedure-specific challenge. Increased costs are major negative consequences of project changes, among others, such as delays (Andersen et al, 2011). The cost increases for project changes typically range from 3 to 23 percent (Love et al, 2004) and are mainly caused by the purchasing company, but also due to errors and omissions in contract documentation (Love and Sohal, 2003).…”

“…Furthermore, implementation, design and result usage of savings measurement for CEP may have an effect on CEP's performance (IP7). Performance measurement design and maturity level, as well as the bonus system, influence the company performance and the purchasing performance (Andersen et al, 2011;Dumond, 1994;Evans, 2004). For instance, we expect that the maturity level of savings measurement for CEP is positively related to CEP's performance (Evans, 2004).…”

Using ANN in emergency reconstruction projects post disaster

“…This will results in a bad construction planning besides social, economic complications. 1 Unfortunately, in the recent years in Iraq, this is the case due to additional bad circumstances of security issues and political conflicts.…”