2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-perihelion volatile production and release from Jupiter-family comet 45P/Honda-Mrkos-Pajdušáková

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as noted above, the statistics for CH in JFCs are far from robust. Recent years have provided several rare and favorable opportunities to observe CH in JFCs [ 52 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 ], providing a much needed boost towards establishing a statistically significant sample of CH measurements in JFCs. However, it is still much smaller than the OCC sample, making comparisons between the two classes more difficult.…”
Section: Results For Specific Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as noted above, the statistics for CH in JFCs are far from robust. Recent years have provided several rare and favorable opportunities to observe CH in JFCs [ 52 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 ], providing a much needed boost towards establishing a statistically significant sample of CH measurements in JFCs. However, it is still much smaller than the OCC sample, making comparisons between the two classes more difficult.…”
Section: Results For Specific Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could explain why the water production rate of Combi et al (2020b) is higher than ours. Dello Russo et al (2020) studied water directly in the infrared. They had a similarly narrow slit to our observations and thus should have a similar water production rate to our value based on the above discussion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This quantity is not measured directly from our observations since the spectral resolving power of our observation (∼4.2 × 10 4 ) corresponds to a velocity resolution of ∼7 km s −1 and is thus insufficient to resolve spectral lines and hence gas outflow velocities. This assumption of the canonical value of v gas introduces a systematic uncertainty in the production rates; however, this has a negligible effect on our derived abundance ratios (Dello Russo et al 2020).…”
Section: Molecular Production Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, production rates derived from nucleuscentered extracts are underestimated. A multiplicative correction factor known as the growth factor (GF) is applied to the Q nc (e.g., Dello Russo et al 1998Russo et al , 2020DiSanti et al 2001) to compensate for these effects. Thus, the total production rate, Q tot , is given by Q tot = (Q nc )(GF).…”
Section: Molecular Production Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation