1992
DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(92)90349-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-irradiation hyperamylasemia as a biological dosimeter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
14
1
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
14
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar changes were observed for salivary a-amylase, considered to be a valid marker for injury of the acinous cells in the salivary glands (14,15). Its use as a biochemical dosimeter has recently been proposed (16).…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…Similar changes were observed for salivary a-amylase, considered to be a valid marker for injury of the acinous cells in the salivary glands (14,15). Its use as a biochemical dosimeter has recently been proposed (16).…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…This radiation injury is also observed in patients with thyroid cancer treated with iodine 131 ( 131 I) 25) . One study has reported that increased levels of amylase in serum were observed for doses to the parotid glands over 0.5 Gy and irradiation over 2 Gy to these glands induced higher levels of amylase, more than 2.5-times the upper normal value 24 hrs after irradiation in 91% of patients 26) . Another study also demonstrated a close correlation between the peak rise in serum amylase and the amount of parotid tissue in the treatment volume 27) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sa survenue après ICT théra-peutique a déjà été rapportée [3,22] et pourrait être en relation avec l'éléva-tion de l'amylasémie, véritable marqueur biologique de l'ICT [7]. Ces symptômes sont souvent accompagnés de douleurs parotidiennes post-ICT [2-3, 15] dont l'incidence semble dépendre de la dose d'irradiation : 23 % après 2 Gy dans notre série contre 64,5 % après 10 Gy [3], au cours des 10 premières heures post-ICT.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified