2006
DOI: 10.1007/bf02943746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-harvest deterioration of sugarcane and chemical methods to minimize sucrose losses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
38
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The shorter the sugarcane section, the more the respiration rate increased. Peeled sugarcane, combined with the application of preservative and vacuum packaging, could be stored for 20 days at 0 o C (Mao and Liu, 2000) (14) Combined application of anti-bacterial and antiinversion chemicals: Solomon et al (2006) reported efficacy of a few chemical formulations containing antibacterial (quaternary ammonium compounds/ thiocarbamates), antiinversion chemicals (sodium metasilicate/sodium lauryl sulphate) in minimizing post-harvest sucrose losses in sugarcane. The aqueous formulation(s) are sprayed over freshly harvested cane (whole stalk and billets) followed by covering the treated cane with a thick layer of dried cane leaves (trash).…”
Section: (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shorter the sugarcane section, the more the respiration rate increased. Peeled sugarcane, combined with the application of preservative and vacuum packaging, could be stored for 20 days at 0 o C (Mao and Liu, 2000) (14) Combined application of anti-bacterial and antiinversion chemicals: Solomon et al (2006) reported efficacy of a few chemical formulations containing antibacterial (quaternary ammonium compounds/ thiocarbamates), antiinversion chemicals (sodium metasilicate/sodium lauryl sulphate) in minimizing post-harvest sucrose losses in sugarcane. The aqueous formulation(s) are sprayed over freshly harvested cane (whole stalk and billets) followed by covering the treated cane with a thick layer of dried cane leaves (trash).…”
Section: (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After infestation, these bacteria reach the internal tissues of cane stalks where sucrose is hydrolysed into monosaccharide like glucose and fructose. Solomon et al, (2006) had showed that yeasts, Leuconostoc, Xanthomonas and Aerobacter were present at the cut or damaged sites of the cane. The latter three microorganisms have the potential to convert sucrose into a polyssacharide, dextran (mucoid material).…”
Section: Microorganisms In Standing Sugarcanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, yeasts and moulds (10 3 -10 4 /g) were also observed (Shehata, 1960;Tilbury, 1970). So far approximately fifty different microorganisms have been reported on green cane while seventeen on the burnt cane which cause huge sucrose losses in post-harvest sugarcane 2006).…”
Section: Microorganisms In Standing Sugarcanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average annual loss to Indian Sugar Industry, as a result of lower sugar recovery, had been estimated to be about Rs. 1600 crores (~32 x 10 7 US$) (Solomon, 1994). Despite huge monitory losses to sugar industry, the management approach to curb post-harvest sucrose losses is almost non-existent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%