2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.607.361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microorganisms affecting Post-Harvest Sucrose Losses in Sugarcane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, result from Table 4 shows higher count than the maximum bacterial load permitted by the Gulf Standards 2000which is 1.0 × 10 4 per mL of juice consumed. Even so, both values obtained in the study were lower than the value reported by Misra et al (2017) which was in the ranged of 10 6 to 10 9 CFU/mL of microorganisms in sugarcane juice. Silva et al (2016) reported that moulds and yeasts are commonly found in freshly pressed sugarcane juice and a study by Milintawisamai et al (2009) reported that in sugarcane juice, the microbial contamination found is mainly yeast.…”
Section: Antioxidant Properties Of Fresh Sugarcane Juicecontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…However, result from Table 4 shows higher count than the maximum bacterial load permitted by the Gulf Standards 2000which is 1.0 × 10 4 per mL of juice consumed. Even so, both values obtained in the study were lower than the value reported by Misra et al (2017) which was in the ranged of 10 6 to 10 9 CFU/mL of microorganisms in sugarcane juice. Silva et al (2016) reported that moulds and yeasts are commonly found in freshly pressed sugarcane juice and a study by Milintawisamai et al (2009) reported that in sugarcane juice, the microbial contamination found is mainly yeast.…”
Section: Antioxidant Properties Of Fresh Sugarcane Juicecontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Over 400 species of actinomycetes, bacteria, and fungi are associated with sugarcane and its products (Stevenson and Rands, 1938). After milling, Penicillium, Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc, and yeast invade the stored sugarcane (Hector et al, 2015;Misra et al, 2017;Misra et al, 2019). These acid-producing microorganisms are the principal cause of deterioration, which lowers the sucrose content, juice purity, and pH, especially under anaerobic conditions such as mud-coated canes and the cane stored in large piles with poor ventilation (Solomon, 2009;Misra et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The glucose and fructose are converted to organic acids and mannitol by the enzymes secreted by these microorganisms. Besides these external microbes, the endophytic microbial ora viz., Acetobacter, Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, Aeromonas, Vibrio, Bacillus, and lactic acid group are also responsible for the deterioration of juice quality during staling (Suman et al, 2000;Misra et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under favorable condition, this bacterium undergoes multiplication to form nodular colonies. Harvested canes have been reported to be more infected with this bacterium [ 6 , 14 ]. Studies have indicated that this bacterium and dextran formation is more in stale canes than in freshly harvested canes [ 4 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%