2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-glitch exponential relaxation of radio pulsars and magnetars in terms of vortex creep across flux tubes

Abstract: Timing observations of rapidly rotating neutron stars revealed a great number of glitches, observed both from canonical radio pulsars and magnetars. Among them, 76 glitches have shown exponential relaxation(s) with characteristic decay times ranging from several days to a few months, followed by a more gradual recovery. Glitches displaying exponential relaxation with single or multiple decay time constants are analysed in terms of a model based on the interaction of the vortex lines with the toroidal arrangeme… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approximately constant second derivativeΩ c interglitch timing behaviour observed in the Vela and other pulsars (Akbal et al 2017;Yu et al 2013) corresponds to a uniform density of vortices unpinned at the glitch leading to a range of waiting times throughout the superfluid regions. Two component models with linear or nonlinear internal torques have so far been applied to post-glitch or inter-glitch timing behaviour of radio pulsars (Alpar et al 1993(Alpar et al , 1996Akbal et al 2015Akbal et al , 2017Gügercinoglu 2017), where the external torque, with a secular (characteristic) timescale τ c ≡ Ω c /2|Ω c | ∼ 10 3 − 10 6 yr is constant for timescales of observed postglitch relaxation.…”
Section: Two-component Models With Constant External Torquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The approximately constant second derivativeΩ c interglitch timing behaviour observed in the Vela and other pulsars (Akbal et al 2017;Yu et al 2013) corresponds to a uniform density of vortices unpinned at the glitch leading to a range of waiting times throughout the superfluid regions. Two component models with linear or nonlinear internal torques have so far been applied to post-glitch or inter-glitch timing behaviour of radio pulsars (Alpar et al 1993(Alpar et al , 1996Akbal et al 2015Akbal et al , 2017Gügercinoglu 2017), where the external torque, with a secular (characteristic) timescale τ c ≡ Ω c /2|Ω c | ∼ 10 3 − 10 6 yr is constant for timescales of observed postglitch relaxation.…”
Section: Two-component Models With Constant External Torquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically several distinct components of relaxation with different relaxation times are observed after pulsars glitches (Alpar et al 1996;Akbal et al 2017;Gügercinoglu 2017). After exponential relaxation is over the response to the glitch continues with a constant second derivativeΩ c .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interactions between neutron vortices and proton fluxoids are therefore unavoidable, and are pivotal in the magnetorotational evolution of NSs. In particular, vortices may pin to fluxoids (Muslimov & Tsygan 1985;Sauls 1989;Srinivasan et al 1990;Ruderman et al 1998) (see also Alpar (2017) for a recent review), and this may have important implications for various astrophysical phenomena, such as precession (Sedrakian et al 1999;Link 2006;Glampedakis et al 2008), r-mode instability (Haskell et al 2009(Haskell et al , 2014 and pulsar glitches Sidery & Alpar 2009;Glampedakis & Andersson 2009;Haskell et al 2013;Haskell & Melatos 2015;Gügercinoglu 2017;Sourie et al 2017;Haskell et al 2018;Graber et al 2018). However, the detailed force acting on individual vortices to which fluxoids are pinned remains poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A static magnetic geometry is impossible in the presence of differential rotation if closed magnetic loops exist inside the star (Easson 1979;Melatos 2012;Glampedakis & Lasky 2015). Flux tubes can also creep outwards in a "lead-ing" manner due to buoyancy forces (Muslimov & Tsygan 1985) or diffusion (Gügercinoglu 2017).…”
Section: Magnetic Ansatzmentioning
confidence: 99%