2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-earthquake damage assessments of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings by shake table test and numerical visualization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By performing a series of environmental vibration tests, the dynamic characteristics of five existing historical bridges were determined, which could be used to construct the vulnerability curve and determine the numerical model of bridge seismic vulnerability. In order to investigate the seismic performance of damaged masonry arch bridges, Kaya et al [158] simulated different damage states using a shaking table test. Then, based on the environmental vibration test, the structural modal parameters under undamaged and damaged conditions were obtained.…”
Section: Masonry Arch Bridge Damage Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By performing a series of environmental vibration tests, the dynamic characteristics of five existing historical bridges were determined, which could be used to construct the vulnerability curve and determine the numerical model of bridge seismic vulnerability. In order to investigate the seismic performance of damaged masonry arch bridges, Kaya et al [158] simulated different damage states using a shaking table test. Then, based on the environmental vibration test, the structural modal parameters under undamaged and damaged conditions were obtained.…”
Section: Masonry Arch Bridge Damage Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, most heritage buildings were constructed with unreinforced masonry (URM) walls. This is one of the structural configurations most vulnerable to earthquakes [2] due to: i) their aseismic design, mainly given by their poor horizontal connections between walls and diaphragms; ii) their low tensile strength; and iii) the difficulty in predicting their behaviour due to their heterogeneity and constructive procedure [3]. Hence, heritage buildings are potentially susceptible to seismic damage, which might result in catastrophic consequences from a social, cultural and economic point of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%