2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-combustion capture of CO2 at an integrated steel mill – Part II: Economic feasibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, primary energy in the fuel can be exploited directly, accompanied with the process heat recovery 35 (see Supplementary Figure 5 ), instead of being transformed into electricity before driving any CO 2 capture processes. In consequence, the energy cost is decreased appreciably 36 and the electricity price is no longer a factor hindering deployment of such a decarbonisation option 25 . In addition, on account of integrating decarbonisation into the steelmaking process via making full use of the limestone feedstock in the CaL-LP scheme (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, primary energy in the fuel can be exploited directly, accompanied with the process heat recovery 35 (see Supplementary Figure 5 ), instead of being transformed into electricity before driving any CO 2 capture processes. In consequence, the energy cost is decreased appreciably 36 and the electricity price is no longer a factor hindering deployment of such a decarbonisation option 25 . In addition, on account of integrating decarbonisation into the steelmaking process via making full use of the limestone feedstock in the CaL-LP scheme (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a charcoal price of 400 €/t and pulverized coal price of 150 €/t, the CO 2 allowance price should be almost 50 €/t CO 2 to reach the break-even point. Comparing biomass use to other CO 2 emission mitigation strategies used in the steel industry, such as Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), one can see that high emission allowance prices are needed in that option too, break-even prices reaching a level of 72 €/t CO 2 in the most favorable option with current solvent technology [60]. The costs for avoided emissions with CCS are sensitive to several factors, e.g., electricity price, used solvents, captured CO 2 amount and selected system boundaries [60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In post‐combustion techniques, CO 2 is separated from flue gases without altering the traditional combustion procedure. In this process, fossil fuels are combusted in excess air, and the product stream contains CO 2 concentration of 12–15% in coal fired combustion, 4–11% for natural gas, and 25–33% in blast furnaces . The capture technique offers flexibility in operation in such a way that, if the capture plant shuts down, the power plant can still operate.…”
Section: Post Combustion Capture (Pcc) For Co2mentioning
confidence: 99%