1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf00237206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible visual pathways to the cat vestibular nuclei involving the nucleus prepositus hypoglossi

Abstract: Non-cerebellar afferents from visual relays to the vestibular nuclei (VN) of the cat have been re-evaluated with the use of the horseradish peroxidase technique. From our data it can be concluded that: (1) A monosynaptic projection from the nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis to the VN can be excluded. (2) Monosynaptic projections from the superior colliculus and some of the pretectal nuclei (nucleus of the optic tract, olivary pretectal nucleus) to the nucleus prepositus hypoglossi may constitute polysynaptic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

1984
1984
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Visual input to the VNC arises from a subcortical pathway which includes the accessory optic tract, the medullary reticular formation, and prepositus hypoglossi (e.g., Magnin et al, 1983); however, visual information also converges on the VNC via the cerebellar flocculus and inferior olive, and a diversity of other sensory information (e.g., proprioceptive and somatosensory input from the spinal cord) is also integrated within the VNC (e.g., Waespe et al, 1983). In addition to these inputs, many VNC neurons also receive disynaptic or monosynaptic input from the contralateral VNC via the brainstem commissures, and the functional effect of this input is usually inhibition; therefore, there exists a lateral inhibitory network between the bilateral VNC which enhances the dynamic sensitivity of the response of VNC neurons to head movement (e.g., Shimazu and Precht, 1966;Nakao et al, 1982).…”
Section: The Vestibular Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual input to the VNC arises from a subcortical pathway which includes the accessory optic tract, the medullary reticular formation, and prepositus hypoglossi (e.g., Magnin et al, 1983); however, visual information also converges on the VNC via the cerebellar flocculus and inferior olive, and a diversity of other sensory information (e.g., proprioceptive and somatosensory input from the spinal cord) is also integrated within the VNC (e.g., Waespe et al, 1983). In addition to these inputs, many VNC neurons also receive disynaptic or monosynaptic input from the contralateral VNC via the brainstem commissures, and the functional effect of this input is usually inhibition; therefore, there exists a lateral inhibitory network between the bilateral VNC which enhances the dynamic sensitivity of the response of VNC neurons to head movement (e.g., Shimazu and Precht, 1966;Nakao et al, 1982).…”
Section: The Vestibular Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar model has been suggested for the floccular control of the optokinetic eye movement response (OKR). The nucleus reticularis tegmenti pointis mediates visual signals to the flocculus via mossy fibers [33] and at the same time relays them to vestibular nuclei, either directly [2] or indirectly [34]. The H-zone of the flocculus thus forms sidepaths to both the VOR and OKR brain stem pathway, and acts to modify either the VOR or OKR by referring to visual climbing fiber signals.…”
Section: Roles Of the Cerebellar Neuronal Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm specifies that the change in input-to-hidden weights is mainly proportional to the error signal (retinal slip) and current input-unit (canal afferent) firing rate (ibid.). The retinal slip signal can be found in the accessory optic system and cerebellum-the latter is known to send a heavy, direct projection to the vestibular nuclei (Wilson and Melvill Jones 1979) and recent anatomical studies in the cat suggest that an indirect projection from the former also exists (Magnin et al 1983). Also, the ability of retinal slip to produce plastic changes in the operation of the VOR is well documented (Wilson and MelviU Jones 1979).…”
Section: Neurophysiological Validitymentioning
confidence: 90%