1964
DOI: 10.1016/0016-6480(64)90005-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible role of ascorbic acid as a physiological depressant of thyroxine degradation in rat liver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1972
1972

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inhibitor also appeared to be responsible for the relative heat stability, pH dependence, and substrate inhibition of the system because all three effects disappeared after the inhibitor was removed by dialysis. The heat stability of deiodinase preparations has been reported by others (Stanbury et al, 1960;Yamamoto, 1964;Lissitzky et al, 1956;Gallon and Ingbar, 1966), and it has been used to challenge the enzymatic nature of the system. However, in view of the marked heat instability of the dialyzed enzyme, it is probable that the inhibitor was responsible for the heat stability observed in crude enzyme preparations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inhibitor also appeared to be responsible for the relative heat stability, pH dependence, and substrate inhibition of the system because all three effects disappeared after the inhibitor was removed by dialysis. The heat stability of deiodinase preparations has been reported by others (Stanbury et al, 1960;Yamamoto, 1964;Lissitzky et al, 1956;Gallon and Ingbar, 1966), and it has been used to challenge the enzymatic nature of the system. However, in view of the marked heat instability of the dialyzed enzyme, it is probable that the inhibitor was responsible for the heat stability observed in crude enzyme preparations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Since then, various aspects of the reaction have been studied, but the published results and conclusions are confusing. An inhibitor that prevents the deiodination reaction from following established enzyme kinetic theory is probably the major cause of this confusion (Stanbury et al, 1960; Wynn and Gibbs, 1962;Nakagawa and Ruegamer, 1964;Yamamoto, 1964). However, a wide variation in substrate concentrations, pH optima, enzyme sources, cofactors, and assay techniques were used, and both enzymatic and nonenzymatic deiodination were observed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As opposed to deiodinases from rat liver homogenates (Stanbury 1960, Wynn and Gibbs 1962, Yamamoto 1964 membrane deiodination is highly active without the addition of any activators. Stimulation by Ca 2 + and Cu z + seems to be a property of the membrane system alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%