2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-015-1094-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible impact of continuous drainage after minimally invasive partial nephrectomy

Abstract: Analysis of the quantity of fluid collection showed little need for routine drain placement. Not placing a drain after MIPN prevented serum protein loss and possibly accelerated wound-healing immune responses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, women had an average drainage time of 3.23 ± 1.33 days and a total drainage volume of 242.79 ± 68.57 mL ( Supplementary Tables S1, S5 ). Our findings align with those of a prior publication that focused on East Asian women in Japan, which reported an average drainage removal time of 4 days and an average total drainage volume of 214 mL ( 7 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, women had an average drainage time of 3.23 ± 1.33 days and a total drainage volume of 242.79 ± 68.57 mL ( Supplementary Tables S1, S5 ). Our findings align with those of a prior publication that focused on East Asian women in Japan, which reported an average drainage removal time of 4 days and an average total drainage volume of 214 mL ( 7 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…All laparoscopic partial nephrectomies in our study were performed by the same skilled surgeon at our hospital, following procedures and settings that had been previously described in a published article ( 7 ). In summary, we utilized a retroperitoneal approach for the majority of patients undergoing LPN in our study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%