2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.81.220505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible evidence of a two-gap structure for theCuxTiSe2superconductor

Abstract: We report a comprehensive transverse-field SR study of Cu x TiSe 2 . The magnetic penetration depth was found to saturate at low temperature as expected in an s-wave superconductor. As x is increased we find that the superfluid density increases and the size of the superconducting gap, calculated from the temperature dependence of the superfluid density, is approaching the BCS value. However, for low values of x, the gap is smaller than the weak-coupling BCS prediction suggesting that two superconducting gaps … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(16 reference statements)
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of this small energy scale has been confirmed by TDO measurements. Indeed, as shown in The presence of this small gap is, to some extent, consistent with the µSR data [9]. However, in contrast with the present measurements, which do not show any significant change of the coupling ratios with doping (2∆ s ∼ [2.4 − 2.8]k B T c ), the µSR experiments suggested a clear increase of the coupling ratio of the small gap with Cu content, leading to the merging of the two energy scales for optimal doping.…”
Section: B Gap Valuessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of this small energy scale has been confirmed by TDO measurements. Indeed, as shown in The presence of this small gap is, to some extent, consistent with the µSR data [9]. However, in contrast with the present measurements, which do not show any significant change of the coupling ratios with doping (2∆ s ∼ [2.4 − 2.8]k B T c ), the µSR experiments suggested a clear increase of the coupling ratio of the small gap with Cu content, leading to the merging of the two energy scales for optimal doping.…”
Section: B Gap Valuessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…On one hand, thermal conductivity measurements [7] suggested that this system is a conventional single-gap s-wave superconductor, in agreement with our recent specific-heat measurements [8]. On the other hand, µSR measurements [9] displayed an anomalous temperature dependence of the London penetration depth indicating the presence of two superconducting gaps in underdoped Cu x TiSe 2 where coexistence between CDW and superconductivity was anticipated. Recently, our local magnetic measurements revealed the existence of an unexpected transverse Meissner effect, clearly showing that vortices remain locked along the ab−planes in tilted magnetic fields [10], hence indicating the presence of an unexpected -and still unexplained -strong modulation of the pinning energy along the c−direction, which might be related to a modulation of the gap/order parameter.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The concomitant potential landscape and spatial variations of the carrier density at the Fermi level can account for the reported Little-Parks effect, as the supercurrents would move in loops within domains defined by these charge inhomogeneities, independent of the local charge order. While the domain size is compatible with the superconducting coherence length in these samples [36][37][38][39][40], the CDW patches uncovered here are too small to confine superconductivity. We do thus not expect to observe the above Little-Parks effect in superconducting Cu x TiSe 2 crystals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Indeed, the more electronegative sulfur renders the structure of TiS 2 more ionic than that of TiSe 2 , so that a larger electrical resistivity is expected for the sulfide, together with a larger Seebeck coefficient. Behind that rather "chemical" view, lays the question of the respective band gaps of TiS 2 and TiSe 2 , and according to the numerous reports on that topic, the question is still not firmly resolved, although band gaps have been attributed for both compounds [25,[27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%