2010
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1492-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible alternatives to tri-bimaximal mixing

Abstract: Possible alternatives to tri-bimaximal mixing are presented based on other symmetry principles, and their predictions for |U e3 |, sin 2 θ 12 and sin 2 θ 23 are compared to the present neutrino mixing data. In some cases perturbations are required to give better agreement with the data, and the use of a minimal approach is illustrated. Precise experimental determinations of the mixing parameters will be required to decipher the correct mixing pattern and to pin down the appropriate flavor symmetry. *

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
179
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
7
179
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reducing the uncertainty on the values of these two parameters is important for measuring CP violation in neutrino oscillations by T2K and other current and future experiments. Furthermore, precise measurements of sin 2 θ 23 could constrain models of neutrino mass generation [107][108][109][110][111][112].…”
Section: Characterizing Systematic Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reducing the uncertainty on the values of these two parameters is important for measuring CP violation in neutrino oscillations by T2K and other current and future experiments. Furthermore, precise measurements of sin 2 θ 23 could constrain models of neutrino mass generation [107][108][109][110][111][112].…”
Section: Characterizing Systematic Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The well-known bimaximal structure has the mixing matrix (Barger et al, 1998) with θ 12 = arccos(Φ/2) and θ 23 = −π/4. Finally, the socalled hexagonal mixing (Albright et al, 2010;Giunti, 2003;Xing, 2003) is described by the matrix which corresponds to the mixing angles θ 12 = π/6 and θ 23 = −π/4. As in the TB case, the above mixing schemes predict the mixing angle θ 13 = 0 and therefore no Dirac-type CP violation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…it is the first column of the TB mixing matrix, corresponding to m 1 = 0. We conclude that the neutrino mass matrix leads to so-called TM 1 mixing [32][33][34][35][36][37][38], in which the first column of the mixing matrix is fixed to be that of the TB mixing matrix, but the other two columns are not uniquely determined, Since the neutrino mass matrix yields TM 1 mixing as discussed above, it can be block diagonalised by the TB mixing matrix, It only remains to put m ν block into diagonal form, with real positive masses, which can be done exactly analytically of course, since this is just effectively a two by two complex symmetric matrix which may be diagonalised with a rotation angle θ ν 23 . This procedure leads to the following exact analytic results for neutrino masses and lepton mixing parameters [30].…”
Section: Jhep09(2016)023mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The starting point for our approach here is the observation that eq. (1.2) leads to trimaximal TM 1 mixing [32][33][34][35][36][37][38], in which the first column of the tri-bimaximal mixing matrix [39] is preserved. The inspiration for our approach comes from the semi-direct model of trimaximal TM 1 mixing that was developed in [40] in which, denoting the three generators of S 4 as S, U, T , the model preserves a 1 In general, neutrino mass models based on discrete family symmetry may be classified into three types [31]: direct, semi-direct and indirect, depending on the residual symmetry preserved in the neutrino and charged lepton sectors.…”
Section: Jhep09(2016)023mentioning
confidence: 99%