Abstract:RESUMO.A diversidade de concepções presente na Psicologia Clínica torna as possibilidades de diálogo entre abordagens uma questão importante. Objetivou-se neste trabalho compreender a dinâmica de aproximações e afastamentos entre duas abordagens humanistas -a Gestalt-terapia e o Psicodrama -a partir da análise dos dados provenientes de entrevistas realizadas com profissionais das duas orientações. A Teoria Fundamentada nos Dados foi escolhida como método, na busca de produção teórica a partir do contato analít… Show more
“…The broader study from which the category of "obstacles" is taken revealed that lived experi-ence in undergraduate classes, initial supervision relationships and difficulties encountered during later clinical practice influence the stand that professionals would later take with regard to integration (Vieira & Vandenberghe, 2014). Other research also has shown that strategic choices and territorial claims influence psychotherapy trainee's theoretical orientation development (Wolff & Auckenthaler, 2014).…”
Philosophical differences and lack of a common language are acknowledged hindrances for psychotherapy integration. To identify additional obstacles for psychotherapy integration, the authors employed a grounded theory analysis of 22 clinician interviews on psychotherapy integration obtained from Brazilian therapists from 2 closely related schools of psychotherapy (11 Gestalt therapists, 11 psychodrama therapists). A complex conceptual category "obstacles for integration" emerged from the analysis. Further analysis of this category was undertaken for the purpose of more thoroughly investigating how therapists from these 2 related approaches argued their views on "obstacles to psychotherapy integration." Analysis showed that not only did participants lean heavily on theoretical discourse but also they employed an "adversarial attitude" that depreciated their "neighboring" professional community. Arguments of this nature included denying that the other school had something different to offer, displaying concern that integration would weaken or undermine their home school's interests, and believing that the dynamics of the extant professional field in Brazil would make psychotherapy integration fail. Several participants appeared to idealize their own community and debase the "other" or to claim a need for strict fidelity for protecting their "slice of the market." We conclude that future efforts to understand and overcome resistance against psychotherapy integration should look beyond clinical arguments to take the dynamics of in-group-out-group social comparison into account. This should include consideration of political struggles over resources, therapists' need for safety and belonging, and therapists' need to protect their investment in training and status within their disparate professional communities.
“…The broader study from which the category of "obstacles" is taken revealed that lived experi-ence in undergraduate classes, initial supervision relationships and difficulties encountered during later clinical practice influence the stand that professionals would later take with regard to integration (Vieira & Vandenberghe, 2014). Other research also has shown that strategic choices and territorial claims influence psychotherapy trainee's theoretical orientation development (Wolff & Auckenthaler, 2014).…”
Philosophical differences and lack of a common language are acknowledged hindrances for psychotherapy integration. To identify additional obstacles for psychotherapy integration, the authors employed a grounded theory analysis of 22 clinician interviews on psychotherapy integration obtained from Brazilian therapists from 2 closely related schools of psychotherapy (11 Gestalt therapists, 11 psychodrama therapists). A complex conceptual category "obstacles for integration" emerged from the analysis. Further analysis of this category was undertaken for the purpose of more thoroughly investigating how therapists from these 2 related approaches argued their views on "obstacles to psychotherapy integration." Analysis showed that not only did participants lean heavily on theoretical discourse but also they employed an "adversarial attitude" that depreciated their "neighboring" professional community. Arguments of this nature included denying that the other school had something different to offer, displaying concern that integration would weaken or undermine their home school's interests, and believing that the dynamics of the extant professional field in Brazil would make psychotherapy integration fail. Several participants appeared to idealize their own community and debase the "other" or to claim a need for strict fidelity for protecting their "slice of the market." We conclude that future efforts to understand and overcome resistance against psychotherapy integration should look beyond clinical arguments to take the dynamics of in-group-out-group social comparison into account. This should include consideration of political struggles over resources, therapists' need for safety and belonging, and therapists' need to protect their investment in training and status within their disparate professional communities.
“…The word drama comes from Greek and has the same meaning as action, activity, and movement (Litwińska-Rączka, 2018). Psychodrama was developed by the psychiatrist Jacob Levy Moreno at the beginning of the 20th century (Apter, 2003; Vieira & Vandenberghe, 2014), as a result of his dissatisfaction with the shortcomings of scientific models at the time, which were seen as limiting of human expression and creativity (Almeida, 2006). Considered the first form of body psychotherapy, psychodrama does not exclusively use verbal expression (Carnabucci & Ciotola, 2013), and the complexities and roles of the patient are accepted without judgment, analysis, or interpretation (Apter, 2003).…”
Section: Psychodramamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreno focused on a group psychotherapy approach in order to express the problem through dramatization (Soysal, 2021). Through the art of theater, Moreno sought the representation of problems (Vieira & Vandenberghe, 2014), by developing spontaneity (defined as the inner experience that allows the person to respond to the present moment through flexible behaviors and thoughts) (McVea et al, 2011), empathy and creativity (Oğuzhanoğlu & Özdel 2005).…”
Sexual abuse is a phenomenon present in all social classes and cultures and has become more relevant in recent decades. Victims suffer traumatic consequences in the short and long terms and one of the possible approaches to be used in treatment is Psychodrama. This study presents an overview of Psychodrama and the Role Reversal technique, as well as its effectiveness, especially in the treatment of trauma, in particular, trauma resulting from sexual abuse. For this study, we searched the main international databases. We have discovered that psychodrama can serve as a highly effective intervention model for individuals who have experienced sexual abuse. However, our primary finding emphasizes the necessity for additional research regarding the efficacy of Psychodrama and its Role-reversal technique specifically for victims of sexual abuse.
“…O Psicodrama é uma abordagem psicoterapêutica cuja importância para a Psicologia é indiscutível, uma vez que compreende o ser humano e seu desenvolvimento do ponto de vista relacional (Vieira & Vandenberghe, 2014). Para Alves (2011), o Psicodrama é visto como uma proposta de investigação do imaginário, de conflitos, do jogo de papéis e personagens que permeiam a convivência humana, tendo como objetivo o desenvolvimento da espontaneidade e a possibilidade de soluções criativas.…”
Relacionamentos amorosos e pós-modernidade: contribuições psicodramáticas Loving relationships and postmodernity: psychodrama contributions Las relaciones amorosas y la posmodernidad: las contribuciones de psicodrama
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.